Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | العربية | Dansk | Nederlands | Filipino | Finnish | Ελληνικά | עִבְרִית | हिन्दी | Bahasa | Norsk | Русский | Svenska | Magyar | Polski | Română | Türkçe

Relenza (Zanamivir) Commercial Issues

Although zanamivir was the first neuraminidase inhibitor to the market, it had only a few months lead over the second entrant, oseltamivir (''Tamiflu''), with an oral tablet formulation.

According to the CDC, Tamiflu, zanamivir’s main competitor, is not as effective at treating the Influenza viruses as zanamivir, especially in H1N1 Seasonal Flu. In fact, tests showed that 99.6% of the tested strains of seasonal H1N1 flu and 0.5% of 2009 pandemic flu were resistant to Tamiflu while there have been absolutely zero flu samples seasonal or pandemic that show any resistance to zanamivir.

When first marketed in the USA in 1999/2000, zanamivir captured only 25% of the influenza antiviral market, despite a huge promotional campaign. By the end of that season, Tamiflu was outselling zanamivir 3:1. During that season, zanamivir experienced worldwide safety warnings involving the risk of bronchospasm and death. Glaxo then reduced the marketing of zanamivir, and Tamiflu's dominance increased. More than US$20m worth of zanamivir sold by Glaxo in the first US season was returned to the company in the next two seasons because zanamivir's actual sales to patients were far less than expected, highlighting the fact that the results of the first season were even worse than first thought.

Biota commenced legal proceedings in 2004 alleging that Glaxo's reduced marketing of zanamivir was a breach of contract. Biota claimed approximately A$700m from Glaxo. After Biota spent four years trying to progress its case, and incurring A$50m in legal costs, the company abandoned the claim in July 2008, recovering only A$20m including legal costs following settlement at mediation. Biota had refused an earlier tactical offer from Glaxo of A$75m plus legal costs.

In August 2006, Germany announced that it would buy 1.7 million doses of zanamivir, as part of its preparation strategy against bird flu. "Germany's purchase shows that countries are starting to take a balanced view of influenza preparedness," says Simon Tucker, head of research at Melbourne-based Biota, where zanamivir was originally developed.

Biota, being only a small company, was not able to bring zanamivir to market by itself. In 1990, zanamivir patent rights were licensed to Glaxo, now GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). In 1999, the product was approved for marketing in the USA and subsequently has been registered by GSK in a total of 70 countries (GlaxoSmithKline News release, 2006). Zanamivir is delivered via Glaxo's proprietary Diskhaler inhalation device. The license agreement entitled Biota to receive a 7% royalty on Glaxo's sales of zanamivir.

Further Reading


This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article on "Zanamivir" All material adapted used from Wikipedia is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Wikipedia® itself is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.