<< Long-reaching damage of the tsunami on mental health | Three more bird flu suspects in Indonesia >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

9/11 responsible for 12 years worth of lung damage for rescuers

Published on August 2, 2006 at 6:07 AM · No Comments

Following the the collapse of the World Trade Centre in 2001 firefighters and other emergency crew workers inhaled vast amounts of 'dust'.

As a result, according to a team of researchers in New York, that exposure has created lung problems which equate to 12 years of age-related respiratory decline.

Dr. Gisela I. Banauch and colleagues at Montefiore Medical Center in New York were able to compare the lung tests of 12,079 rescue workers in the year after the disaster to lung function tests carried out before the attacks.

Banauch and her team had access to respiratory function results of New York City Fire Department workers from 1997 onwards because routine lung tests were carried out every 18 months as part of routine medical screening.

Their investigation showed that those present when the North and South Towers collapsed or arrived later that morning, suffered the most damage and some still had breathing problems.

The researchers say there was a substantial reduction in forced expiratory volume, the amount that can be breathed out in one second, in the year after September 11 2001.

It seems 13.7% of the rescue workers were exposed to the most amount of dust by arriving on the morning of the disaster and being present when the towers collapsed, while a further 67.8% arrived on the scene two days after the collapse, and 16% arrived after the third day.

The most severe and frequent respiratory symptoms were experienced by those exposed in the first days after the collapse and were worse than workers who arrived later.

Although only 22% of workers who arrived early reported wearing a mask on the first day, that had increased to 50% by the third day, but the researchers say it did not appear to have had a protective effect.

Dr. Banauch who is an associate professor of medicine at Albert Einstein College in New York says some of the effects were the result of acute irritation of the airways but that smaller follow-up studies showed some rescue workers were suffering from more long-term effects.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading