<< Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines do not appear to protect against pneumonia | Researchers gain new insight into cancer metastasis >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Prolonged nevirapine in breast-fed babies prevents HIV infection but leads to drug-resistant HIV

Published on January 5, 2009 at 10:05 PM · No Comments

Babies born to HIV-positive mothers and given the antiretroviral drug nevirapine through the first six weeks of life to prevent infection via breast-feeding are at high risk for developing drug-resistant HIV if they get infected anyway, a team of researchers report.

But the investigators highlight the proven superiority of the six-week regimen in preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission in breast-fed infants.

In a study led by researchers at Johns Hopkins Children's Center, risks of drug resistance in the first year of life were compared in Indian infants getting a standard single dose of nevirapine at birth and those on the six-week regimen.

"While extended nevirpaine prophylaxis dramatically reduces HIV transmission during the first six weeks of life, our data show that if infection does occur, it will most likely be with strains resistant to nevirapine, making HIV much harder to treat early with nevirapine," says senior investigator Deborah Persaud, M.D., a pediatric HIV expert at Hopkins Children's. "But until other interventions become available, the extended nevirapine regimen remains a reasonable way to prevent infections through breast-feeding."

Published in the Jan.1 issue of Public Library of Science One ( PLoSOne ), the research report emphasized that in the developing world especially, where bottle feeding is not safe, too expensive or simply unavailable, the extended nevirapine therapy remains one of the best ways to reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV through breast milk.

Given the high risk of death from HIV in infancy, the benefits of fewer infections still outweigh the risk of increased resistance, the researchers conclude.

The findings also suggest that because of their higher risk for acquiring resistant HIV strains, infants given extended courses of nevirapine—should they get infected—should receive treatment with protease inhibitors (PIs), which are effective against nevirapine-resistant strains.

"In the developing world testing for resistance is not available or too expensive," Persaud says, "so if extended nevirapine regimens become widespread, PIs should be made available as a first line of treatment early on for all infants who get infected despite prophylaxis."

The new report comes on the heels of two separate multi-center studies from Johns Hopkins and other institutions, published in 2008, showing that a six-week regimen with nevirapine or a 14-week regimen with nevirapine slashed the risk of HIV infection from breast-feeding by 46 percent and 66 percent, respectively.

For the current study, investigators analyzed samples from 74 Indian babies infected with HIV before, during or after birth. Of the 74 infants, 22 were infected before birth, 19 were infected during birth or during early breastfeeding (three to six weeks after birth) and 33 were infected during late breast-feeding (around six months after birth). Of the 19 infants infected through breastfeeding in the first six weeks of life, four were given daily nevirapine for six weeks, and 15 received a single dose at birth. All four babies on extended nevirapine developed resistant strains of the virus, while only four of the 15 given a single dose tested positive for resistant strains after infection.

It is important to keep in mind that while the risk of resistance is higher with extended nevirapine regimens once infection occurs, the risk of acquiring HIV with extended regimens is dramatically reduced, the investigators say. Thus, in the long run, extended nevirapine regimens do not lead to more resistant cases than the single-dose regimens because single-dose regimens also carry some risk of resistance and are also less effective in preventing new infections.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading