<< Vibration plate machines may aid weight loss and trim abdominal fat | Australia's top medical experts throw their weight behind alcopops tax increase >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | العربية | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

FDA approves Avastin (bevacizumab) for aggressive brain cancer

Published on May 11, 2009 at 3:53 AM · 1 Comment

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved Avastin (bevacizumab) to treat patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) when this form of brain cancer continues to progress following standard therapy.

GBM is a rapidly progressing cancer that invades brain tissue and can impact physical activities and mental abilities. It affects about 6,700 persons in the United States every year. Following initial treatment with surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy, the cancer nearly always returns.

“This type of cancer is very resistant to therapy and thus challenging to treat,” said Richard Pazdur, M.D., director of the Office of Oncology Drug Products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Avastin provides a therapy for patients with progressive GBM who have not responded to other medications.”

Avastin is a laboratory-produced molecule known as a monoclonal antibody that mimics the antibodies produced by the body’s immune system to defend against harmful substances. The medication inhibits the action of vascular endothelial growth factor that helps form new blood vessels. These vessels can feed a tumor, helping it to grow and can also provide a pathway for cancer cells to circulate in the body.

The drug was first approved in 2004 to treat metastatic cancer of the colon or rectum and has since been approved for treatment of non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer and metastatic breast cancer.

In two clinical trials, about 25 percent of patients with GBM responded to Avastin with an average duration of response of about four months.

The most serious side effects associated with Avastin, in some cases resulting in death, are gastrointestinal perforation, wound healing complications, hemorrhage, and blood clots. Other serious side effects of Avastin are severe high blood pressure, nervous system and vision disturbances, decreased white blood cell counts, infection, stroke, myocardial infarction, and kidney problems.

The most common adverse reactions were nose bleeds, headache, high blood pressure, runny nose, excess proteins in the urine, taste alteration, dry skin, rectal bleeding, excessive tearing, and skin peeling.

Avastin is manufactured by Genentech Inc. of San Francisco.

http://www.fda.gov

Comments
  1. Maen Addassi Maen Addassi United States says:

    I think the Avastin is a big bubble should be finished for example:
    1.  Colorectal Cancer: with Oxaliplatin was not impressive. Only with Irinotecan also a negative result in early cancer
    2.  Breast cancer with old product called Paclitaxel was given a good result (only progression free survival not overall survival)  but in the other hand with the newest & most common drug Docetaxel with a trial called Avado trial ; it seems the result was not so impressive they tried to promoted the Hazard ratio rather than a clinical result. The median time to disease progression was 8 months with docetaxel alone, compared with 8.7 months with docetaxel plus low-dose bevacizumab, and 8.8 months with docetaxel plus high-dose Bevacizumab it is 0.8 months = 24 days !!!
    3.  Lung cancer : at the beginning with Paclitaxel it was made a  good survival a trial called E4599 by A Sandler published at 2006 at NEJM it is add 2 months for overall survival (from 10.2 to 12.2 ) with  a double dose and of course a double cost
    4.  Renal cell carcinoma : same story; without any advantages regarding survival
    Kindly note the British health system was refused Avastin for CRC or other indications due to lack cost effectiveness
    Is it worth this!!!

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading