<< Cognitive shortcut causes people to miscalculate weight and caloric intake | Sinovac completes construction of H1N1 virus seed bank >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | العربية | Nederlands | हिन्दी | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Genomic discovery: Protecting kidney function during heart failure

Published on June 16, 2009 at 3:03 AM · 1 Comment

Mayo Clinic cardiology researchers have found a peptide that helps preserve and improve kidney function during heart failure, without affecting blood pressure. Earlier variations of this peptide caused blood pressure to drop limiting the potential benefits to the kidneys. The findings appear in the current Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"Heart failure itself and some of the approaches used to treat it can have detrimental effects on the kidneys," says Mayo cardiologist and lead researcher Robert Simari, M.D. "Our hope is that this compound will help protect kidney function while you're being treated, and possibly shorten your hospital stay and keep you out of the hospital."

This new peptide (a unique link of amino acids) has been tested in the laboratory and in animal models and is expected to move into clinical trials next year.

"One of the biggest additional concerns for patients with heart failure is the health of their kidneys," says Dr. Simari. "The extreme case is that it can lead to the kidneys shutting down completely." Nearly 5 million Americans are living with heart failure, a condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs. Symptoms include shortness of breath, exercise intolerance and fluid retention. All can occur when heart function is impaired.

The mapping of the human genome (2000-2003) revealed a gene that produces a protein called BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide). BNP was not only useful in diagnosing heart problems, it also proved therapeutic in treating heart failure. Unfortunately, says Dr. Simari, it had limited use because many heart failure patients experience low blood pressure and BNP lowered it further.

The Mayo investigators discovered an alternative splicing (AS) of BNP in messenger RNA (produced by the same gene). When they shortened the amino acid sequence of ASBNP for testing, they found that it had the same therapeutic benefits as BNP, but without the side effects to blood pressure. Positive impacts include increasing the kidney filtration rate, suppressing harmful protein production, and keeping water and salt flowing from the body. Potentially, this new drug would be given by IV to patients who are being treated in the hospital.

Comments
  1. HARVEY  GROVE HARVEY GROVE United States says:

    I do not care if the doctors do have a financial interest in their discovery. They are entitled to reap the rewards of their intellectual property. If the discovery is that good i find it immoral that he could not gain materially. Some company will gain. Why shouldn't the discoverer? Why don't you think of it as a reward for the discovery so that others have an incentive to pursue their ideas. In that way we all benefit. As it is you seem to be of the opinion that all inventors are pushing their inventions solely for profit. There are many who do it just for the recognition. Profit was not the main goal. Many inventions were strictly accidental. How about penicillin? There are a load of researchers working to develop a vacine for h1n1. The one who does it is certainly entitled to the rewards and there is nothing wrong for the discoverer or inventor to speak or write about it. Who knows more about it than the one who developed it out.

    Nobody will benefit if it is not brought to market and this requires much costly research and development. I do not think a person should be discouraged from pursuing his/her idea to the end just because others believe the data is "incorrect". It has to speak for itself. The scientific method demands that the results be duplicated.

    FDA has to make the final decision to market or not and they are not biased. If the product is safe and effective before it is marketed this is one of the checks and balances. If the promoter is lying or "fudging" information he/she will shortly fall into disrepute by his'/her own colleagues. The truth will out.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading