<< Health care reform should include protections for retiree health care benefits | Medicare Advantage's preventive health care strategy keeps seniors out of the hospital >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Roche's peg-EPO product Mircera infringes Amgen patents

Published on September 16, 2009 at 4:47 AM · No Comments

Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN) today announced that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Massachusetts District Court's decision that Roche's peg-EPO product, Mircera, infringes four Amgen patents ('868, '698, '933 and '422) relating to recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) and processes for making it. Regarding a fifth patent ('349), the Federal Circuit reversed the holding of non-infringement by the District Court and remanded that issue for a new trial allowing Amgen to show that Roche's product infringes that patent as well. The Federal Circuit also affirmed the validity of Amgen's patents except for a single issue of obviousness-type double patenting which only impacts Amgen's later expiring patents ('933, '422 and '349). The Federal Circuit remanded this issue to the District Court for further analysis.

"We are pleased with today's decision," said David Scott, Amgen's senior vice president and general counsel. "The successful enforcement of intellectual property rights enables Amgen to continue to invest in truly innovative new medicines."

Today's decision affirms the infringement and validity on all grounds for Amgen's process patents ('868 and '698), affirms the infringement on Amgen's product patents ('933 and '422), affirms all but one validity issue which will be further reviewed by the district court on the '933, '422 and '349 patents, and allows Amgen a new trial to show infringement of the '349 patent.

The Federal Circuit left undisturbed the permanent injunction that prohibits Roche from selling its pegylated EPO product, Mircera in the United States.

Scott added, "Biotechnology innovation is complex, expensive and extremely risky. Companies and investors need appropriate intellectual property protection to justify the risk and to realize an appropriate return on investment."

http://www.amgen.com

Posted in: Medical Patent News

Tags: , , , , , ,

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading