<< Study: Hip replacement patients with MoM implants pass metal ions to their infants during pregnancy | Stryker's Orthopaedics division to feature two of its latest hip systems at AAOS conference >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | Nederlands | हिन्दी | Русский | Polski

End-of-life directives prevail over preferences and objections in woman’s desire to be cryonically preserved

Published on March 10, 2010 at 4:47 AM · No Comments

In one of the more unusual cases to confront the Colorado courts, the El Paso County Probate Court in Colorado Springs has granted Holme Roberts & Owen (HRO) client Alcor Life Extension Foundation of Scottsdale, Arizona, custody of the remains of Colorado Springs nurse Mary Robbins. The ruling upheld Ms. Robbins’s 2006 agreement with Alcor to have her head cryonically preserved after death, hoping that future technologies could bring her back to life.

“It's not unusual for there to be disputes, because what Alcor does is novel to so many people”

Colorado Springs HRO Litigation Partner Eric Bentley was joined by Denver Special Counsel Norv Brasch of the firm’s Private Client Services Group. “It's not unusual for there to be disputes, because what Alcor does is novel to so many people,” Bentley said, “and there's always a chance that relatives will have strong feelings about these matters when they learn that a relative has expressed this wish for the disposition of their remains.” From a legal perspective, Brasch notes that the Court’s ruling addressed and resolved several novel issues in the Colorado Probate Code. “The Alcor case stands for the principle that an individual’s end-of-life directives will prevail over the preferences – even the objections – of surviving family members.”

The March 1 ruling followed a full-day emergency hearing on February 26 before El Paso County Probate Court Magistrate Barbara Hughes, who delivered an unmitigated victory to Alcor in a forceful, six-page opinion. Ms. Robbins’s family and friends claimed that, two days before her death on February 9, she had revoked her wish to be cryonically preserved and diverted the annuity funds designated for her preservation to her daughters. The case hinged on whether Mary's long-standing desire to be held in cryosuspension would be honored in the face of this claim.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading