<< Lorillard Tobacco issues statement on FDA's TPSAC public meeting | Versar awarded $7.6M contract to review and evaluate pesticide product >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Polski

ECRI Institute revamps medical devices rating system

Published on March 31, 2010 at 6:33 AM · No Comments

Big changes have been implemented in the way medical devices are being rated by ECRI Institute® (www.ecri.org), an independent, nonprofit organization that researches the best approaches to patient care. The organization, which has been guiding hospitals and other healthcare organizations on medical devices and procedures since 1971, has revamped its rating system to follow a five-star approach. This month's issue of Health Devices features an evaluation of portable/transport ventilators, the first technology to be rated using the new five-star scale.

This new rating system offers a more updated perspective on product evaluations than the organization's previous system, which rated products as Preferred, Acceptable and Not Recommended.

"When the original rating system was devised four decades ago, it was not uncommon for us to test devices that failed to meet even the most minimum safety standards," says James Keller, Jr., Vice President, Health Technology and Safety, ECRI Institute. "Thankfully, product safety has come a long way, and we rarely find a device that just plain works badly. Our new rating system better reflects the caliber of today's medical devices."

Now, an easier-to-understand rating scale, with five gradations of rating instead of three, will allow analysts to better convey the products' advantages and disadvantages, giving a more accurate picture of which devices will be more suitable for a particular organization.

"Our objective is not only to determine which product is best, but also to provide the right amount of analysis to help organizations decide what is best for their specific needs," says Keller. "For example, the most appropriate ventilator for a long-term care use may not be the best one for mass-casualty critical care."

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading