<< Traces of many medicines found in fish swimming in treated waste water | 60 Minutes examines PEPFAR in Uganda >>
Read in | English | Dansk | Bahasa

Mass. municipalities could be hard hit by Cadillac tax

Published on April 5, 2010 at 12:29 PM · No Comments

The Boston Globe: "Massachusetts municipalities that offer employees, retirees, and elected officials the most generous and costly health insurance plans will feel the squeeze of the new national health care law's tax on 'Cadillac' insurance plans. A family health plan that costs more than $27,500 would be subject to a 40 percent tax on every dollar spent above that threshold. The tax, set to take effect in 2018, would be levied on insurers, who would probably pass it on to municipalities and other employers. A few cities and towns already have family plans that exceed $27,500, and many others are on track to surpass that level before the tax kicks in. That means taxpayers in many communities could be facing thousands of dollars in additional costs for every employee, retired worker, and elected leader they cover, unless those communities move soon to scale back coverage, a change the law is designed to encourage" (Murphy, 4/5).

The Boston Globe, in a separate story: "Thousands of consumers are gaming Massachusetts' 2006 health insurance law by buying insurance when they need to cover pricey medical care, such as fertility treatments and knee surgery, and then swiftly dropping coverage, a practice that insurance executives say is driving up costs for other people and small businesses."  These consumers' medical spending "while insured was more than four times the average for consumers who buy coverage on their own and retain it in a normal fashion. … The problem is, it is less expensive for consumers — especially young and healthy people — to pay the monthly penalty of as much as $93 imposed under the state law for not having insurance, than to buy the coverage year-round." Recent legislation filed by Gov. Deval Patrick would only allow people to enroll in insurance coverage two times per year on the individual market and would allow waiting periods before coverage begins. "But insurers say stronger action is needed. Consumer advocates caution, however, that many people who sign up for short-term coverage may merely be between jobs" (Lazar, 4/4).

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading