<< BRIC telemedicine market to grow at 15.8% CAGR to reach $418.4 million by 2014: Report | New research explores effects of radiation on human bone after stereotactic radiosurgery >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Norsk | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Hospitals should inform patients about availability of insurance coverage for breast reconstruction: New law

Published on August 18, 2010 at 7:39 AM · No Comments

While breast reconstruction after a mastectomy is covered by insurers in New York, many poor, minority, and less educated women do not seek out the procedure.  Now, NY Gov. David A. Paterson has signed into law a bill that is aimed at reversing this trend.  

"A disproportionate number of women who are at a socioeconomic disadvantage do not get breast reconstruction surgery after a mastectomy for one of several reasons.  Either they are unaware of it as an option, they do not know it is covered by Medicaid and Medicare insurance programs, they do not know where to gain access to the procedures, or it is never mentioned to them by their other doctors," said Evan Garfein, MD, the plastic and reconstructive surgeon at Montefiore Medical Center who authored the Bill.  

He hopes that the new law (A10094B/S6993-B/Information and Access to Breast Reconstruction Surgery) will correct this disparity.  It requires hospitals in New York to inform breast cancer patients about the availability of, and insurance coverage for, breast reconstruction before they undergo "mastectomy surgery, lymph node dissection or a lumpectomy."  

While Congress passed the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act in 1998, which guaranteed universal coverage for reconstruction after surgery, and New York soon passed comparable provisions into its laws, disparities in access remain.

"Breast reconstruction has been repeatedly shown to improve the quality of life and overall well-being of women who have been treated for breast cancer," said Dr. Garfein.  "This new law will ensure that breast cancer patients from all socioeconomic groups are informed about their options regarding breast reconstruction and about where to get the procedure."

Why the Bill is Needed: Letitia Was Never Told About Reconstruction

Letitia M., a 39-year-old single mom of two who lives in the Bronx, was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2006.   She had felt a lump in her left breast and her primary care physician confirmed her suspicions of cancer after he referred her for a mammogram and sonogram.  Even though she consulted with three different doctors while planning her treatment, none of them mentioned reconstruction as an option.

Letitia first had a lumpectomy and then a full mastectomy.  It was only later in the treatment process, while she was receiving radiation therapy at a Manhattan hospital, that she learned about reconstruction.  It was at this time that she was referred to Dr. Garfein at Montefiore, who subsequently performed reconstruction – two years after her cancer surgery. When Letitia was asked why she did not undergo reconstruction at the time of her mastectomy, she replied that no one had mentioned that it was an option.

Letitia is doing well and is on the road to recovery.  While it is possible that she would have chosen to delay her reconstruction until after her cancer surgery and radiation therapy were complete, the standard of care in 2010 is to at least offer her the option of immediate reconstruction at the time of her mastectomy.  The purpose of the Bill is to make sure that no woman ever says, "I didn't get reconstructed because no one mentioned it to me."

One-Third of Women With Breast Cancer Choose Reconstruction

Breast reconstruction is not for everyone.  Each year, a quarter of a million women are diagnosed with breast cancer, according to the American Cancer Society.  Of those who undergo mastectomy, 30-40 percent, depending on the study, receive breast reconstruction, according to Dr. Garfein.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading