IRS faces GOP criticism on health care tax credits

Published on August 3, 2012 at 11:37 AM · No Comments

During a Capitol Hill hearing Thursday, House Republican lawmakers grilled the director of the Internal Revenue Service on his agency's ruling allowing qualified individuals to get tax credits to buy health insurance in federal health insurance exchanges.

The Associated Press: Republicans Grill IRS Commissioner On Health Care
House Republicans on Thursday grilled the head of the Internal Revenue Service on the agency's decision to apply the health care law's tax credits in states that decide not to carry out a key provision of the statute. Commissioner Douglas Shulman defended the IRS rule that applies the tax credits to federal insurance exchanges, which are the bodies that will be developed to allow those without health insurance to buy it. He testified at a House hearing (Margasak, 8/2).

The Hill's Healthwatch: IRS Defends Against GOP Charges Of 'Illegal' Healthcare Tax Credits
Republicans and conservative policy experts say the IRS has gone too far in implementing the Affordable Care Act, specifically its subsidies to help people buy private insurance (Baker, 8/2).

CQ HealthBeat: Hearing Highlights Dispute Over Subsidies For Federal Health Insurance Exchanges
House Republicans expressed support for the argument that the health care overhaul does not authorize subsidies for individuals in exchanges set up by the federal government at a Thursday hearing that featured dueling witnesses on the issue. The controversy centers on an Internal Revenue Service rule finalized in May that allows the federal government to provide subsidies to help eligible individuals buy health insurance through state and federal exchanges created under the law beginning in 2014 (Attias, 8/2).

Politico Pro: IRS Chief Defends Federal Exchange Ruling
Opponents of the health law argue that the statute specifically provides tax credits to purchase insurance only through exchanges established by the states. A recent 70-page paper released by Case Western Reserve University's Jonathan Adler and the Cato Institute's Michael Cannon argued that it wasn't a drafting error, but an intentional decision by Congress to incentivize states to build their own exchanges. Cannon, who testified at the hearing, and Adler contend that the IRS is flying in the face of congressional intent by issuing a rule allowing federal-run exchanges to issue tax credits the same as state-run exchanges. "It's quite literally taxation without representation," Cannon told the committee (Millman, 8/2).

In other news from the Hill -

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post