1. Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

    You repeat questions ive answersed & answered quite consisely. You state a native Peruvian suffers racism in his or her native Peru? Seems your just being argumenitive. The youngest mensa member is no mere dime a dozen prodigy but again are Hispanics genetically inferior IQ wise to Europeans. You can simply say yes or no to make it easier on your self. I wouldn't provide peered reviewed information when it seems you have not read my peer reviewed information.  Quid pro quo Javier but 1st your answer would be appreciated. Ive answered your question albeit you may not like or agree with the answers but nevertheless ive answered them. My question requires but a two or three letter word. We can carry on if you like but a direct answer would be appreciated. So again are Hispanics genetically inferior in respects to IQ.

    • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

      Hugh Cipher,

      First, when you say "ou state a native Peruvian suffers racism in his or her native Peru? "

      OF COURSE THEY DO, and it isn't a rare thing. Indigenous people suffered racism.

      Do a very quick confirmation, most (above 80%) of peruvian population is indigenous, yet when you see peruvian TV, only white-like actors appear. OTOH, in the US TV, you see plenty of black actors, at least matching the % of black population in the US (if not more).

      And this happens in all latinamerica. So, being native doesn't grant you to get exempt from severe racism.

      About the mensa kid, please learn some facts. IQ test can not be taken seriously at very young age. AND scores tend to be higher when younger than in adulthood, cause you can get more Edge. For instance, Guiness record holder Von Savant had 228 in her teens, now in adulthood he has a little more of 180. So, a kid having 141 (even we'd accept it as a valid test) would not be something that impressive, case it only says that he is 41% better than the average of his age, 200+ and we'd be talking. And again, prodigies are dime a dozen. What is important is which of such prodigies develop into brilliant adults.

      And I wouldn't have any problem admitting we hispanics have some kind of genetic burden, cause my PERSONAL IQ and personal achievements are far ahead of whites or jews averages.

      My point was that, unlike blacks, what gives hispanics al least benefit of the doubt, is that, at least sometimes, hispanics showed capability to beat the top notch of whites jews and asians, in fields that demand extremely high abstraction capability (real science or chess in my examples), something not seen in black in recent history.

      Even the mayan example is not equivalent to the egypt example, cause there is not real certainity about the ethnicity of egyptians, and it was so long ago, so it's difficult to verify, AND blacks have not reproduced again such supposed level of achievement (being capable of getting to the top) in science, math or astronomy.

      While with mayans or Moxo inhabitants, there is no way of uncertainity, cause their civilization was isolated from Europe, when they developed their math and science, ahead of the europeans of their time. And such hispanics have repated achievements in the examples I showed you before.

      And again, it is you who fail to explain, given the fact that there are MILLIONS of black kids from wealthy families raised decades ago, ¿how come there are examples of blacks getting to the top even in very elitists sports, yet we have ZERO blacks getting to the elite in science or chess, when such intellectual  fields were and are far less elitists than sports like tennis?

      • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

        It is very sad you actually feel your people have a genetic burden. Devote some study to the psychological and social effects of discrimination on your own peoples. The racism and color bias with in your own culture. Were you see a genetic burden I see a people discriminated against and whos countries are not as well economically developed as Europe’s or Asia's. A people oppressed but less oppressed than Black Africans so you see them with an over all  2 to 3 pt higher IQ average. A people who have achieved academic accolades but usually its their more European members who have achieved these accolades. I dont see this as genetic based but as culturally and society based. The more European one looks the better they are treated through out life. This affects ones life tremendously. Extrapolate this across a whole ethnic group and we will see the type of results we see in Hispanic populations.
        You are happy to admit genetic inferiority because a few of your group members have mere trophies (nobel prizes)?
        Do your own self a favor and eliminate all of the environmental factors that effect you people before you so readily drink the White supremacist kool-aide. Then you can return to a conversation with me with a clear and un colonized state of mind and view of this phenomenon  

        If i was ever angry at you I no longer am....I feel sadness for you hombre de Quechua pelu

        • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

          When you say "It is very sad you actually feel your people have a genetic burden."

          I answer you THE TURTH DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A FAIRY TALE!

          Are you aware that DEATH is an horrible fact of reality? It is far more horrible than unfairness regarding intellect celing, isn't it?

          Why a lot of unfairness is accepted easily (death, hunger, native athletic potential that you can't teach, etc.) yet you feel so offended by something so trivial like difference in intelligence ceiling?

    • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

      Before you get angry in the Egytp's case, something to read voices.yahoo.com/...nes-confirm-that-12124134.html

      So, please, don't mix the ethnicity of the elite, with the ethnicity of the masses.

      • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

        Im not surprised you hold these beliefs about Kemet Nut ie: Egypt but this is a pdf of the latest dna testing done by  geneticist confirming Egypt had Black Africans through out its society and enlarge began as an African society
        dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf (pages 2 to 5 I recommend)
        This confirms what eye witness such as Herodotus have said about Egypt and which is that its people were Black Africans
        As for your Meso American ancestors the Olmecs, they more than likely were of mixed African decent the fact being Black Africans were in meso Ameica before Columbus
        www.examiner.com/.../evidence-africans-discovered-america-170-years-before-columbus
        and the Olmec artifacts speak for themselves and the fact that
        the 1st peoples in the Americas were Black Afro-Aboriginals
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6IrMjfbh6E
        lend weight to this theory on the Olmecs. As for Egypt again this debate is over. The DNA results are in and they agree with me and Herodotus

        • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

          ALL HUMANS come from Africa, even Europeans. If you see that way, all of us will have Africans allell in a DNA test

          My point is that genetic traits  define a 'race': hair, eyes, skin, and in the issue discussed here, physical and intellectual average CEILING.

          Of course envirmonment plays, but also genes, like in EVERYTHING!!

          Why still fail to explain, why would inteliigence be an exception? if nature is by definition wild and unfaair, why would nature have to be 'fair' regarding intelligence?

          Forget everything else and ANSWER THE QUESTIONS, PLEASE.

          How come world class athletes have been produced in even very elitists sports (like tennis back then in my example), yet ZERO top-notch 'mental athletes' were produced in areas far less elitists as chess or hard science?

      • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

        The iGENEA King Tut DNA results are a fraud. iGENEA never had actual dna samples of Tut but used information from a discovery channel documentary & filled in the blanks. They've made thousands by bilking Whites who are hopeful to be related to Tut. Theyve been cheated.  Unlike iGENEA the DNATribes results are academic peer reviewed & taken from actual royal mummies.
        m.livescience.com/...-channel-tutankhamen-dna.html

        • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

          Cleopatra for insance, was macedonian.

          And the other point is that back then, science was almost unexistant. While in the mayans example is from far more recent times.

          And besides, how come such supposed achievement of blacks was not seen in more recent times?

          When will you answer this? how come you can find a¿black athletes getting to the top in very elitists sports, yet you find nothing in far less elitists fields like science and chess?

          And please don't missinterpret me, I'm not happy with unfairness at all, my point is trying to accept reality as accurate as possible, without the 'politically correct' bs.

          Accepting reality is a far better option for real help, IMO.

          • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

            Cleopatra was a Ptolemy Greek Egyptian. She was undoubtedly of Greek/Macedonian heritage but her sister Arsinoe was recently found and scientist identified she was of African decent so Cleopatra may have been of mixed African blood also www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx

            I applaud the Mayans past achievements. The fact they live on a tribal level (some call primitive) is proof civilizations rise and fall as the people who built them do.
            There are scores of brilliant Black scientist. Most definitely enough to prove their ancestors could  have built civilizations in the past . We need not point to Egypt alone but Nubia,Axum,Benin and Timbuktu are all examples of advanced Black African civilizations. The north western European who dominates the world today did not do so in ancient times. There are no pyramids in Berlin. No grand ancient BC period temples in Paris.
            The reasons why peoples build grand civilizations have more to do with environment than genes. This is why the meso American Indians built grand civilizations but their north American cousins did not-environment. I would watch guns germs and steel http://www.pbs.org/gunsgermssteel/ to get a better idea of this dynamic.
            As to your repeated question I will try to make it uber clear

            The racism Blacks suffer is far more acute and damaging than that of Hispanics
            Afro Americans culture was destroyed in slavery and have they have created a dysfunctional culture do to the oppressive dysfunctional conditions they suffer through
            Hispanics have a very intact and well grounded culture. This gives Hispanics a tool to fight psychological oppressions/racism that Blacks do not have
            Blacks have scores of highly intelligent scientist and mathematicians and  the fact Blacks only have one Nobel prize in hard science (economics) does not negate this
            The reality is that I know my self and have known many brilliant Blacks and this alone proves to me there is not gene or genes that are distributed amongst Blacks or Hispanics more so than others that cause low IQ
            Yes genes play a role in IQ but these genes are not distributed amongst one race more so than another
            There are far to many environmental factors that must be ruled out before one can jump to such conclusions as certain races are genetically inferior in terms of IQ

            As for athletic achievement again Blacks are not oppressed physically
            When laws forbade Blacks to play in sports you did not see these achievements
            Today the oppression is psychological, economic and environmental thus you see a lack of achievement in these areas-IQ falls under the realm of psychology
            I believe this is a clear answer to your query
            Now if you do not accept these reasons this is another thing and I can do nothing to sway you that the research and insights I have previously given can

            • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

              Lot of flaws in your statements.

              First, Economy is NOT  a hard science, it's far closer to pshychology than to physics or math.

              Next, it's still missing how come in very elitists sports like tennis, black players appeared in the top level, yet it doesn't happen in science or chess.

              My tennis example was clear, grand slams or Davis Cup in one side ZERO in the other side.

              If very clear attributes are more present in some races, that end up in clear differences in hair, eyes or skin color, WHY WOULD  ABSTRACTION CAPABILITY BE THE EXCEPTION?

              That's something no denialist can explain at all.

          • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

            I'll leave you with this question & why I use this as an anology of how culture can defend against racism.
            Have you heard of the Latino paradox?
            As you know ive stated that Hispanics have stronger cultural bonds that deflect racism.
            The Latino paradox is a term that comes from a study that showed Latino/Hispanic immigrants have lower rates of mental illness than even rich Whites. Latino immigrants also are physically healthier than any race or class of Americans
            One factor many researchers attribute this to is that Hispanics have tight nit strong family groups (culture) that insulate them from the stress & racism of American society.

            It is well known physical & mental illness is tied into peoples social economic status. The richer you are the longer you live. This has more to do with the stress of being poor than medical attention although this is a factor also.  Social economic status & racism effect mental health & IQ being a mental or cognitive function is naturally effected as well.
            So in ending this is explains the reason why Hispanics have achieved certain academic accolades that Blacks have not. As ive stated Hispanic have a strong intact culture that lessens the effects of discrimination
            Again Afro American culture does not have this protection mechanism

            This is an interesting article I reccomend
            http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/2543060/

          • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

            news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/also_in_the_news/7945333.stm
            This is the correct link about recent the recent discovery that Cleopatra was of mixed Black African decent

          • Hugh Cipher Hugh Cipher United States says:

            Eye & skin color are traits that
            Can be attributed to single or a few genetic mutations.  Cognitive ability is a product of a myriad of genes & enviromental effects. One would think if since the races vary in skin, hair & eye color so why not mental ability but its not that simple for one fact intellectual capability, mental cognition & the organ it springs from(the brain) is far more complex than mere eye color.
            its like comparing a cars engine & transmission  to the cars paint job

            • Javier Perez Javier Perez Bolivia says:

              And athletic potential is product of a few genes?

              How come in speed sprint, blacks are unbeatable, no matter how hard white athletes train?

              Are white atletes segregated in such competitions?

              What other explanation would you give to blacks being capable of produce world class, unbeatable athletes, even in some very elitist sports, yet they fail to produce ONE, OOOOONNNNEEEEE  Nobel laureate in a hard science, one winner of the Fields medal, or ONE chess elite player?

              You can{t blame envirnoment 100% on this, it is ABSURD DENIAL.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post