1. Michael Calcaterra Michael Calcaterra United States says:

    The predisposition of this article is well summarized by the final quotation Sean Morrison.  He says that patients ARE NOT HELPED by therapies that have not gone through today's approval orthodoxy.  This is not the statement of a scientist.  It completely lacks the objectivity required for a true scientific approach.  Factually, at therapy may help and may even save the lives of patients long before the $100 to $200 million USD required for this approval in the US.  Is it possible that it is this flow of cash that worries Professor Morrison rather than the patient outcomes?

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.