1. Phyllis Phyllis United States says:

    Maybe you are not aware of some of the actual restrictions that are in HR3200. If there truly was freedom of choice that would be one thing, but upon reading the bill one can see that freedom of choice is not allowed. Some examples: pg 84 All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange. Pg 145-An employer must auto-enroll employees into the govenment run public plan. Pg 167 Any individual that does not have acceptable healthcare will be taxed 2.5% of income. Pg 341-The government has the authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans, HMO's, etc. Pg 272 has quite a bit to say about cancer patients and how decisions will be made for their treatment. Pg 29-42 talks about the Health Choices Commissioner and Commission. This group will be the decision maker for treatment and our treatment will be based on a formula that uses our age and the statistical averages for survivability to determine if we are a candidate for treatment. This is very similar to GB's plan. Over 90% of Americans are happy with their healthcare plans. The stat is that 1 in 7 are underinsured. If we take out the illegal alien piece, that number goes down significantly. Just fix the 1 in 7. The marketplace does have the answer, but there is more here than just getting people insured. It was in the WSJ this week that about 7 years ago a "special" end of life panel was set up in the Veteran's Admin to "help" veterans make better, "less selfish" choices as they aged. The previous administration rejected it. The current administration has revived it for veterans and it is the model for the rest of the healthcare plan. These are just some of the issues that have brought so many Americans out to the town hall meetings. Maybe these are not a concern to you, but they are for many of us. By the way Medicare is almost bankrupt. I know the president keeps using the UPS/Fedex/Post Office example about choice, but when he says that I hear "UPS/Fedex are privately owned and profitable while the USPS is government run and bankrupt. That is a no-brainer for me. Nearly anything the government runs, fails. Our most recent example is the cash for clunkers program. Less than 2% of dealers have been reimbursed and they were mandated to destroy the engine in the cars they accepted, so now they can't re-sell them. It looks like the government created a program, got everyone on board and then left the bill for someone else to pay. Nothing from the government is free. It is up to regular citizens to decide how much we want to be indebted to this overbloated system.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.