NHS surgeons left to "pick up the pieces" after poor surgery at private treatment centres

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

NHS surgeons are being left to "pick up the pieces" after poor surgery at private treatment centres, warns a senior doctor in the British Medical Journal.

"The number of patients we are seeing with problems resulting from poor surgery is too great," argues Angus Wallace, Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery at the University of Nottingham.

There is no doubt that the expansion of orthopaedic services, provided by the Department of Health through private hospitals and independent sector treatment centres (ISTCs), has been a much needed development, but it has occurred at a price, he writes.

What has happened in ISTCs is that junior specialists have been imported from overseas and asked to provide total surgical care without help and supervision from a more senior colleague, a situation that is alien to many of them - hence the reason why the failures find their way to the NHS hospitals.

He suggests that this situation has arisen because of a political philosophy called "additionality." When ISTCs were set up, there was concern that their development might result in NHS hospitals losing some of their own surgical staff. To ensure that this could not happen a six-month rule was imposed - an NHS surgeon could not work in an ISTC until he or she had stopped working for the NHS for six months.

While this ensured that the NHS hospitals were protected from losing their own staff, it also meant that the ISTCs did not have access to many, or any, senior surgeons who could act as senior consultants and help their colleagues when they ran into trouble.

"Now we are seeing the consequences of this philosophy - poor operations, inadequate supervision of surgeons, and a poor mechanism for remedying any problems that occur," writes Wallace.

There are also concerns about how clinical governance and appraisal procedures are being addressed in ISTCs, creating a suspicion by NHS staff that corners have been cut in achieving the goals of high productivity and throughput.

But perhaps the issue that should be of most concern is that of training the country's up and coming surgeons, adds the author. The "straightforward" cases, now dealt with by the ISTCs, had been the cases on which young NHS surgeons learnt their craft. This time honoured and soundly proven method of training has now, sadly, been denied. Consequently the competence of our next generation of surgeons is in jeopardy.

"We, as NHS staff, need to help, and many of us wish to, but we are frustrated by the artificially created divide between the ISTC and the NHS hospital," he says. "The government has created a two-level health service that is creating many problems. I believe that we should now integrate the ISTCs with the NHS instead of running them as a private healthcare system paid for by the state."

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Smoking, drinking, and dietary habits linked to head and neck cancer risk, study finds