Diverting nonemergency cases from EDs in Canada does little to improve care quality for other patients

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Diverting nonemergency cases from emergency departments in Canada does not have much impact on the efficiency or timeliness of care given to sicker patients, according to a study published Wednesday on the Annals of Emergency Medicine Web site, the Houston Chronicle reports.

For the study, lead author Michael Schull of the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences in Toronto and his colleagues examined 4.1 million patients at 110 hospitals in Ontario, Canada, between April 2002 and March 2003 to determine whether care for nonemergency patients "cause[d] slower care for sicker patients," the Chronicle reports.

According to the study, for each nonemergency patient who arrives at an ED, each patient seeking emergency care experiences an increased length of stay of 32 seconds.

Every 10 patients with nonemergency ailments arriving in any eight-hour period added an average of only 5.4 minutes to emergency patients' length of stay and an average of 2.1 minutes to the time emergency patients' spent waiting to see a physician (Ackerman, Houston Chronicle, 8/23).

Schull cast doubt on the idea that nonemergency cases are the main factor behind ED overcrowding, pointing instead to factors such as a lack of inpatient beds, inefficient use of resources and failure to quickly transfer patients to other departments (Roser, Austin American-Statesman, 8/23).

"The take-away message is that the benefit of diverting patients is so small that it isn't worth it.

Caring for patients with minor ailments doesn't lead to clinically important delays and turning them away isn't very patient-focused," Schull said.

Thomas Granchi, medical director of Ben Taub General Hospital Emergency Center in Texas' Harris County, said Schull's findings are "counterintuitive" and do not affect physicians' "assumptions or current knowledge."

He added that the study compares "apples and oranges," as the U.S. and Canadian health systems differ (Houston Chronicle, 8/23).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Balancing efficacy and safety: The challenges of mRNA drugs and vaccines in modern medicine