<< VentriPoint Medical System receives CE Mark approval | Schizophrenia: Once-monthly INVEGA SUSTENNA not inferior to bi-weekly RISPERDAL CONSTA >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | Nederlands | Русский

FDA clears AdvanDx' 90 minutes PNA FISH protocol for S. aureus and CNS tests

Published on December 10, 2009 at 8:42 AM · No Comments

AdvanDx today announced that it has received FDA 510(k) clearance for a fast, 90 minutes protocol for its S. aureus PNA FISH® and S. aureus/CNS PNA FISH® tests. The faster protocol reduces the PNA FISH turn-around time from the original 2.5 hours to 90 minutes by reducing PNA probe hybridization from 90 minutes to 30 minutes. Clinical validation studies performed at hospitals in the United States demonstrated excellent equivalence between the 90 minutes protocol and the original PNA FISH protocol, ensuring the faster protocol maintains the very high sensitivity and specificity required versus slower, conventional methods.

Staphylococcus species are both the most frequent causes of bloodstream infections (BSI) and blood culture contamination. True infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus present considerable clinical challenges associated with increased mortality rates, prolonged hospital stays and add significant extra hospital costs. In the United States alone, 300,000 hospitalized patients contract a S. aureus infection leading to more than 12,000 deaths, 2.7 million excess LOS days and close to $9.5 billion in excess hospital charges. Blood culture contamination with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CNS) on the other hand, account for up to 30% of all positive blood cultures and often result in a false diagnosis of a true staphylococcal bloodstream infection that leads to unnecessary coverage with broad-spectrum antibiotics, extra length of stay and unnecessary extra costs. As conventional identification methods can take several days to differentiate between true infection and contamination, clinicians must rely on empiric therapy which may result in either unnecessary or inadequate treatment.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading