<< Brief course of chemotherapy after surgery should be the new standard of care around the world | Scientists successfully isolate stem cells from human skin >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | हिन्दी | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Minimally invasive approach to removing diseased thyroids

Published on June 27, 2005 at 10:15 AM · No Comments

An incision about half the length used for traditional surgery works just as well in removing diseased thyroids, researchers have found.

This minimally invasive approach is safe, likely speeds wound healing and has a superior cosmetic result, according to findings published in the June issue of Laryngoscope.

The study looked at 44 patients with cancerous or benign thyroid disease who had surgery between September 2003 and May 2004 at Medical College of Georgia Medical Center or the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Augusta.

"This is a very straightforward approach in skilled hands that allows us to use smaller incisions while still safely identifying important structures in the area, which are the nerves to the voice box and the parathyroid glands," says Dr. David J. Terris, Porubsky Professor and chair of the MCG Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and lead author on the study.

This approach incorporates various techniques to reduce the typical incision size across the base of the neck – from about three to four inches to one to two inches – while still enabling removal of all or part of the peach-sized gland that controls metabolism. Growths on this gland can cause jitters and weight loss.

"We use retractors to get exposure and use telescopes and other laparoscopic instruments that can fit through a small incision then we work off the video screen," says Dr. Terris. "I send many patients home the day of surgery because it's so much less invasive."

To access the thyroid, most otolaryngologists make a horizontal incision at the base of neck, called a transverse cervical collar incision, move the muscles and dissect out the thyroid. This approach remains the best option for some patients who have had previous surgery or have an extremely enlarged thyroid.

But most patients – 65 percent of the 44 patients in the study – likely can benefit from a smaller, more direct approach, Dr. Terris says. He notes that working through the smaller space increases surgery time about 20-30 percent, but that has not been a deterrent for his patients.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading