<< Lessons from our patients: development of a warm autopsy program | Sunitinib shows promise in treating metastatic renal cell cancer >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Finnish | Bahasa | Русский | Svenska | Polski

How many men have osteoporosis?

Published on June 7, 2006 at 6:45 PM · No Comments

Though it's much more common in women, osteoporosis can strike men too, often with debilitating consequences.

Until recently, male-oriented research into the disease lagged far behind that devoted to women. But with more men living longer, and with their rates of osteoporosis climbing as a result, studies of male risk have become more common.

In research presented at the IOF World Congress on Osteoporosis in Toronto, Canada, Dr. Jane Cauley from the University of Pittsburgh, showed that rates of hip bone loss increase with age among both white and non-white men, particularly those 75 years or older. The study cohort of 5,995 individuals reflects the diversity of the male US population, Cauley says.

As with women, Cauley explained, osteoporosis in men results in part from declining levels of estrogen, which normally keep bone-depleting inflammatory compounds called cytokines in check. Without sufficient estrogen, cytokines strip away at bone layers through a process called resorption. Over time, weakening bones develop the hallmarks of osteoporosis, becoming brittle and fracture-prone. Rates of hip fracture were especially pronounced among Hispanic men, for unknown reasons, Cauley said. "The increase may be due to inadequate vitamin D, but really we don't yet know why Hispanic men are more vulnerable."

Cauley emphasized the study reinforces a basic message: namely that men over the age of 70 should consider a bone density check. "If bone density is good, you may not need to repeat the test, but if it's low, you may need to retest within a few years and maybe start thinking about treatment," she said.

In a further study, Dr. John Wong from Tufts University and his colleagues estimated the number of male fractures and associated costs from 2005 to 2025. Using a computer model that simulates costs, morbidity, and mortality for different age and racial/ethnic groups of men in the United States, Wong and colleagues predicted a 56% increase in the incidence of male osteoporotic fractures, from a total of 595,000 to 925,000.

The model also predicted a commensurate rise in related costs, from a baseline of US $4.1 billion to US $6.7 billion. The increase in male fracture incidence, Wong said, can be attributed to rising numbers of elderly people in the US population, which is steadily aging.

A large portion of the total cost of treating fragility fractures in the United States goes to treating men, a new study revealed. "People are not really aware that this disease also occurs in men as well as women, as a result, they don't really understand the economic consequences of osteoporosis in men," said Dr. Rick Adachi, professor of medicine at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and lead author on the study.

But Adachi and colleagues found that 30 percent of the total cost of treating fragility fractures goes towards treating men. "This was higher than anticipated and contradicts the view that women alone are at risk for fragility fractures and the costs and consequences associated with them," Adachi said.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading