<< British farmer dies from rabbit flu | No matter how you do it tobacco is a killer >>
Read in | English | Nederlands | Finnish

BMI unreliable when assessing obesity and risk of heart disease

Published on August 21, 2006 at 9:13 PM · No Comments

According to doctors in the United States the standard measure of obesity, the Body Mass Index (BMI), is badly flawed and may not be such an accurate indicator as it lumps muscle and fat into one category.

Researchers from the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, say they have found that people with a BMI of 30-35 were at lower risk of cardiovascular disease than those whose BMI was below 20.

They also say that overweight patients had better survival rates and fewer heart problems than those with a normal BMI.

They have arrived at this seemingly contradictory conclusion after examining data from 40 studies covering 250,000 people with heart disease and say they do not deny that obesity is a major health threat but rather that the 100-year-old BMI test was too inaccurate an instrument to be trusted.

Lead researcher Francisco Lopez-Jiminez says rather than proving that obesity is harmless, the data suggests that alternative methods might be needed to better characterize individuals who truly have excess body fat compared with those in whom BMI is raised because of preserved muscle mass.

It is estimated that as many as 30,000 people in Britain and 300,000 in the United States, die because of obesity every year.

In the U.S. the condition is now thought to have overtaken smoking as the main cause of preventable death.

Body Mass Index was invented by Belgian polymath Adolphe Quetelet in the eighteen hundreds and is a measure of body fat calculated from height and weight.

A figure of less than 18.5 is considered underweight, while from 18.5 to 24.9 is normal, 25 to 29.9 is overweight and anything over 30 is categorized as obese.

Originally intended as a broad indicator of general health, it has now become a standard diagnostic tool of heart disease risk but this latest study has found the test badly flawed.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading