<< Cyprus considers social welfare measures to offset declining fertility rate | Progress being made in efforts to stop female genital cutting in Mali >>
Read in | English | 繁體中文 | Norsk

Some health experts concerned proponents of mandatory HPV vaccination are acting too soon

Published on February 22, 2007 at 5:30 AM · No Comments

Some public health experts recently have expressed concern that proponents of human papillomavirus vaccination legislation -- including Merck, producer of the HPV vaccine Gardasil -- have acted "far too fast" and are "potentially undermining eventual prospects for the broadest possible immunization," the New York Times reports (Pollack/Saul, New York Times, 2/17).

Gardasil and GlaxoSmithKline's HPV vaccine Cervarix in clinical trials have been shown to be 100% effective in preventing infection with HPV strains 16 and 18, which together cause about 70% of cervical cancer cases. FDA in July 2006 approved Gardasil for sale and marketing to girls and women ages nine to 26, and CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices later that month voted unanimously to recommend that girls ages 11 and 12 receive the vaccine. GSK in April plans to file for FDA approval of Cervarix, and it expects approval by the end of this year (Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report, 2/9). According to the Times, at least 20 states are considering proposals that would mandate HPV vaccination for young girls. Joseph Bocchini, chair of the committee on infectious diseases at the American Academy of Pediatrics, said HPV vaccination mandate proposals have "created a significant controversy over things that have nothing to do with the vaccine," adding, "If the public had enough experience with the vaccine and had enough knowledge about HPV, the question about whether to get the vaccine or give it to their daughters wouldn't be an issue." According to Bocchini, opposition to the vaccine could cause the public to be mistrustful of the vaccine. In addition, opt-out provisions in most of the proposed bills have caused concern among health experts. Martin Myers, executive director of the National Network for Immunization Information, said that some experts are concerned that if parents "opt out of one vaccine, they will opt out of other vaccines that are due at the same time" (New York Times, 2/17). According to the Miami Herald, Florida Sen. Mike Fasano (R), a sponsor of an HPV vaccination measure (S 660), has said he favors delaying mandatory vaccination until August 2008 to give parents and the Legislature a "chance to get educated" (Tasker, Miami Herald, 2/18). The American Academy of Pediatrics currently does not support mandatory vaccination. Some physicians are concerned about Gardasil's cost -- $360 for a three-shot series -- and low insurance reimbursements to physicians. Bocchini said state legislatures should focus on funding the vaccine for girls and women ages 13 to 26, rather than mandating the vaccine for middle school-age girls (New York Times, 2/17).

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading