<< M. D. Anderson wins $8.3-million to research environmental causes of major diseases | Why bladder cancer hits more men than women >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Dansk | Nederlands | Filipino | Finnish | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Review of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal tumors

Published on April 21, 2007 at 11:39 PM · No Comments

Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal tumors has gained increasing acceptance as a standard of care in appropriately selected patients.

Much has been made of the importance of limiting ischemia time to the kidney, during renal artery clamping and tumor resection, to avoid irreversible ischemic damage to the retained renal parenchyma. Some clinicians have proposed that the renal artery rarely needs to be occluded during tumor resection, but rather external compression ("the grip of death") can be used as an alternative to control bleeding during tumor resection and thus minimize ischemic time to the rest of the kidney. Here, Duvdevani and colleagues examine their experience with nephron sparing surgery over a 15 year period in a retrospective fashion, to determine the potential morbidity and benefits of renal artery occlusion during nephron sparing surgery for localized renal tumors.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading