<< Coalition proposes using Medicaid, SCHIP funds to purchase private coverage for uninsured | Average 2008 employee out-of-pocket costs for family health care to increase 10.5%, according to Milliman Index >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Filipino | Bahasa | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Senate leaders agree on privacy protections amendment to health care information technology bill

Published on May 19, 2008 at 7:20 AM · No Comments

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on Wednesday announced that sponsors of a bill (HR 1693) that would promote the use of health care information technology have agreed to include an amendment Leahy proposed to help protect patient privacy, CQ HealthBeat reports. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chair Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) introduced the legislation last October.

Leahy had raised concerns that the bill, which would extend the medical privacy rule issued after the passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act to electronic medical records, did not include adequate privacy protections (Wayne, CQ Today, 5/14). The rule allows some health care providers to distribute medical records for marketing purposes (Edney, CongressDaily, 5/15).

Under the amendment, providers could not distribute medical records for marketing purposes, and patients would have the right to request electronic copies of their records (CQ Today, 5/14). The amendment also would require HHS to develop recommendations for Congress on privacy and security and establish a patient notification system in the event of a breach of their medical records.

Kennedy and Enzi this week plan to introduce the amended bill. Leahy in June plans to hold a hearing on the privacy protections in the legislation (CongressDaily, 5/15). Melissa Wagoner, a spokesperson for Kennedy, said, "We made progress today, but this isn't a done deal yet," as the Bush administration has requested some technical revisions to the bill, and the Congressional Budget Office has not determined a cost estimate for the amendment (CQ Today, 5/14).

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading