Future of Medicare at stake in Presidential election, opinion piece states

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

"At stake in the presidential election is whether we will all need to consult lobbyists to have our medical issues heard by a remote, bureaucratic Medicare program," Scott Gottlieb, a former CMS official and an American Enterprise Institute fellow, writes in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.

According to Gottlieb, CMS, lawmakers and presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) "are all moving to expand government influence over the medical choices we make," and the House as early as Tuesday might approve legislation that would reduce funds for Medicare Advantage. "Democrats hate Medicare Advantage and have been trying to cut it for quite some time because they don't like health care markets," Gottlieb writes, adding, "Why cut? For all the talk about finding health care savings with painless 'reforms' like better information technology or disease management, the only way to really control costs under our current health care model is to control access to drugs, devices and services."

He writes, "The crucial question is where the controls should be -- with patients working through private plans or with government agencies," adding, "While private health insurance is imperfect, there's a misguided faith in Medicare's superiority." Gottlieb writes, "Many in Congress assume that private insurers are driven by greed" and that "only a government-run health program can ensure adequate access to services," but MA plans "offer prevention and wellness benefits, care coordination and alternatives to hospitals at the end of life that traditional Medicare does not provide."

Presidential Candidate Proposals

Obama "has been honest about his intentions" to "cut from Medicare Advantage to pay to expand 'fee-for-service' Medicare programs," but his "endgame is to leave the government-administered Medicare program in a position to set decisions for the entire health care system," according to Gottlieb.

He adds that the "fundamental question we are being asked in November" is whether "we stick with a 'defined benefit,' where everyone is promised the same government services," or "move toward a 'defined contribution' system" -- a system supported by presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) -- "where seniors can buy private health insurance." Gottlieb concludes, "Patients covered under Medicare Advantage have their own discomforts, but at least they can always change plans and appeal decisions," without having to "consult a lobbyist" (Gottlieb, Wall Street Journal, 6/24).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Increased drug coverage restrictions in Medicare Part D raises concerns