<< Uganda plans survey to determine prevalence of MDR-TB, health official says | Herpes drug Acyclovir could help control HIV >>

House Committee weighs options for permanent overhaul of Medicare physician payment system

Published on September 15, 2008 at 4:57 AM · No Comments

Witnesses at a House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee hearing on Thursday discussed potential methods for overhauling the Medicare physician payment system, CQ HealthBeat reports.

American Medical Association President Nancy Nielsen said that if the 20% payment reduction scheduled for Jan. 1, 2010, takes effect, many doctors will stop seeing Medicare patients. Former CMS Administrator Gail Wilensky said, "I am very worried about what is going to happen to physician participation" under the current "sustainable growth rate" system. The SGR aims to minimize incentives for physicians to order excessive care for the purpose of increasing their income.

Wilensky said the current system is flawed because individual doctors who act responsibly cannot influence the system enough to avoid cuts. She added that by setting 100,000 individually-tailored SGRs, CMS could give doctors incentives to order only appropriate services, thus lowering Medicare costs. According to Wilensky, another option could be to bundle payments to health care providers by paying a set amount per patient during a period of time to discourage use of excessive services.

Donald Crane, CEO of the California Association of Physician Groups, suggested a "capitated" physician payment system, which he said would place a greater emphasis on prevention and early treatment to keep costs down. Crane pointed to the experience of medical groups that currently are receiving capitated payments and said, "Capitation incents frugality. That is its chief virtue."

Bruce Vladeck, head of Medicare and Medicaid under former President Clinton, said strengthening primary care by increasing payments to primary care doctors and encouraging more medical students to choose primary care as a career path would reduce costs. Advocates said that a stronger primary care system would lead to more attention to the overall health of patients, better preventive care and better coordinated care. He also defended the current fee-for-service payment system.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading