Recent Comments

Comment RSS

Los Angeles Times examines increase in Caesarean births, related rise in risk, cost

19. May 2009 18:25

Caesarean sections -- which are performed in 31% of births, up from 4.5% in 1965 -- often are considered an unnecessary risk and "an example of how the intensive and expensive U.S. brand of medicine has failed to deliver better results and may, in fact, be doing more harm than good," the Los Angeles Times reports.

According to the Times, c-sections can increase a woman's risk of complications, such as infection, blood clots and premature delivery. Even without complication, c-sections typically result in longer hospital stays and increased costs.

Expenses related to c-section births account for 45% of the more than $79 billion in annual hospital charges that childbirth incurs in the U.S. annually. The average uncomplicated c-section costs about $4,500, which is about twice the cost for vaginal births. C-sections cost about $13,000 for privately insured patients. According to a 2008 report by Childbirth Connection, "The financial toll of maternity care on private (insurers)/employers and Medicaid/taxpayers is especially large." It also said, "Maternity care thus plays a considerable role in escalating health care costs, which increasingly threaten the financial stability of families, employers, and federal and state budgets."

Addressing the Increase

The Institute for Healthcare Improvement has launched its Strategic Partners program to address the surge in c-section births, the Times reports. Under the program, hospitals are trained to enforce a set of guidelines, such as a ban on elective deliveries before 39 weeks' gestation. In the program's four years, 60 hospitals have agreed to participate. According to Elliot Main, chief of obstetrics for Sutter Health, typical c-section births are a "profit center in hospitals, so there's not a lot of incentive to reduce them." However, program Director Frank Federico said, "It's a culture change," adding, "We're at a tipping point. ... It used to be that we spent more time defending the 39-week rule. Lately, there's no question about that. It's, 'How can we improve the process to support that?'" (Girion, Los Angeles Times, 5/17).


Kaisernetwork.orgThis article is republished with kind permission from our friends at The Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery of in-depth coverage of health policy developments, debates and discussions. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for Kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Copyright 2009 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Posted in: Medical Procedure News

Tags: , , ,

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.

Add comment



(Will show your Gravatar icon)
  Country flag


biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



News-Medical.Net provides this medical information service in accordance with these terms and conditions. Please note that medical information found on this website is designed to support, not to replace the relationship between patient and physician/doctor and the medical advice they may provide.