<< Surgeons successfully perform first-in-man results with four channel laparoscopic surgical platform | Federal official chooses Wiley newsletter to discuss his plans for strengthening addiction treatment in community corrections >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | हिन्दी | Norsk | Русский | Svenska | Polski

CT and PET scans carry a very real risk of radiation exposure

Published on September 1, 2009 at 12:05 AM · No Comments

Thomas Dehn, M.D., FACR, executive vice president and chief medical officer of National Imaging Associates, a Magellan Health Services (Nasdaq: MGLN) company, today issued the following statement about the New England Journal of Medicine study published on Aug. 27 regarding patient exposure to ionizing radiation in imaging procedures.

“This article in the New England Journal of Medicine (“Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures”) further underscores the radiation safety risks for patients associated with the overuse of advanced diagnostic imaging procedures – especially those exams without established clinical necessity or value.

“As a radiologist, I've seen first-hand the amazing contributions that these imaging tests provide to patient care. However, study after study has proven that imaging exams that use ionizing radiation, especially CT and PET scans, carry a very real risk of radiation exposure. As with any technological advance or diagnostic option, it’s incumbent on our profession to responsibly balance the benefits and risks for each patient.

“When you consider the multiple studies that have concluded as many as one-third of all advanced imaging procedures paid for by Medicare are clinically unnecessary and do not contribute to the physician’s understanding of a patient’s condition, this issue takes on even greater significance.

“The best approach to managing this risk is not to curtail use of this technology or to heighten public fear in a way that discourages patients from following their physicians’ recommendations. Rather, we need a responsible system of checks and balances to safeguard the clinical appropriateness of these tests, ensuring that patients are receiving the right scans at the right time from the most qualified and safe imaging providers.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading