Consumer Watchdog corrects Gov. Schwarzenegger's analysis of malpractice caps and premiums

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Consumer Watchdog sent the following letter to Congressional leaders today in response to a letter sent by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in which he incorrectly cited California's draconian limits on the legal rights of injured patients as a successful cost containment tool. Consumer Watchdog is a nonpartisan nonprofit with offices in California and Washington, D.C. The Governor's October 27, 2009 letter is available at: https://www.gov.ca.gov/

October 29, 2009

The Honorable Harry Reid

Majority Leader

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable Nancy Pelosi

Speaker of the House

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Mitch McConnell

Minority Leader

United States Senate

Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable John A. Boehner

Minority Leader

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, DC 20515

Dear Senator Reid, Senator McConnell, Madam Speaker and Mr. Boehner,

Tuesday, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger wrote you regarding his views on health care reform. While Consumer Watchdog has detailed its views on comprehensive federal health reform many times over the past year, we write today in response to a particular element of the debate addressed by Governor Schwarzenegger, in which he incorrectly cited California's draconian limits on the legal rights of injured patients as a successful cost containment tool.

The plight of injured patients and families subject to unjust legal restriction in California has been well documented. Jury-ordered compensation been slashed by a one-size-fits-all damages cap unadjusted for three decades. Too many children, seniors and people with limited wage loss are unable to get legal representation and are locked out of the justice system altogether because of the restrictions. (See "Malpractice Law May Deny Justice," by Dan Costello, Los Angeles Times, December 29, 2007. For video testimony about the real impact of caps see: http://www.JusticeForPatients.org.)

That human toll, however, is not the subject of this letter. Our purpose is to correct Governor Schwarzenegger's analysis of the relationship between malpractice caps and malpractice premiums.

California has, indeed, maintained severe caps on malpractice liability for doctors for more than 30 years, but the Governor ignores the fact that the caps did nothing to reduce doctors' insurance premiums for the first 13 years of the law. We have documented that premiums for California doctors went up by 450% between 1975 and 1988. Only after California voters enacted the comprehensive insurance regulatory system, known as Proposition 103, did doctors begin to see relief from skyrocketing malpractice rates. (You can read our study at: https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/)

In fact, in 2002 and 2003, medical malpractice insurers were attempting to push doctors' premiums skyward in California as in the rest of the nation. Our organization used Proposition 103's right to challenge insurers' rate proposals and fought off $66 million of attempted rate hikes. That is, even with the longstanding and severe malpractice caps in place, doctors in California were facing the same insurance hikes at the beginning of this decade that faced doctors everywhere.

In our challenge to a proposed rate hike by one of California's largest medical malpractice insurers, SCPIE, the company's Vice President and chief actuary James Robertson testified:

While MICRA was the legislature's attempt at remedying the medical malpractice crisis in California in 1975, it did not substantially reduce the relative risk of medical malpractice insurance in California. (A copy of the SCPIE testimony is available at: https://www.consumerwatchdog.org/)

The reason California doctors have fared comparatively well is not the limitations on patients' rights in California, but the voter-imposed limits on insurance company profiteering. We would be pleased to provide more details on this issue.

Sincerely,

Douglas Heller, Consumer Watchdog

cc: The Honorable Max Baucus

The Honorable Christopher J. Dodd

The Honorable Charles E. Grassley

The Honorable Mike Enzi

The Honorable Charles B. Rangel

The Honorable Henry A. Waxman

The Honorable George Miller

The Honorable Dave Camp

The Honorable Joe Barton

The Honorable John Kline

Members of the California Congressional Delegation

The Honorable Arnold Schwarzenegger

Comments

  1. Lake Tahoe Hotel Reservations Lake Tahoe Hotel Reservations United States says:

    Lol Schwarzenegger should make movies. He is more successful at that.

  2. Larry Nign Larry Nign United States says:

      This is a really good letter to a very serious problem here in California. I have a lot of experience in dealing with California politics and how Sacramento politicians have a hard time understanding that Injured and disabled people have rights and many have special needs.

    The Experience that I have gained has come as a result of becoming disabled many years ago and learning first hand that no one cares in California politics how one is treated as a seriously injured or disabled person. The documentation is so strong that some years ago I started to preform a public service and created www.mystatefundstory.com website. This is an ongoing effort to prove to millions of Californians that state officials do not care about the treatment of the injured and disabled. My website has become very effective in proving that state officials really do not care about what happens to the injured and disabled and their families. California state senator Bob Huff did take the time to write and inform me he had been to my website and complemented me on my commitment.
    It has become very clear that Politicians  care far more about insuring they stay in public office and will do what is necessarily to accomplish that goal first, In Closing California state officials do not really care about the injured and disabled, I believe because we can not work and pay taxes.  

      Sincerely
    Larry Nign
    Founder www.mystatefundstory.com

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.