Tax provisions in Senate health bill draw scrutiny

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Several news organizations report on new taxes in the Senate health bill and how they differ from those in the House-passed measure.

"Amid all of the uncertainties about how healthcare legislation would affect each American, one thing is clear: The more affluent would pay higher taxes," The Los Angeles Times reports. "Embracing the progressive -- and sometimes politically risky -- principle that the cost of carrying out public policies should fall to the well-off more than the disadvantaged, both the House and Senate bills would place new taxes on the wealthy to help pay for expanded insurance coverage." The taxes, however, come in different forms. "Under the House bill, couples with more than $1 million in income would pay an additional surtax of as much as 5.4%. The Senate bill would hit families of more modest wealth -- those making more than $250,000 -- with a payroll tax hike of 0.5%" (Hook, 11/20). 

"Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) made a late change to his bill by adding an extra Medicare payroll tax, which would generate $54 billion over 10 years according to the Congressional Budget Office," The Wall Street Journal reports. "Henry Aaron, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the extra tax on wages could have a distorting effect by causing high earners to take their pay in stock or other forms of compensation, rather than wages."

Meanwhile, "Conservatives said the proposed Medicare tax increase undermines the claim that Medicare is a social-insurance program, not a vehicle to redistribute wealth. That argument 'has been demolished,' said J.D. Foster, a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation." There are also other new taxes in the Senate health bill, including "a 40% excise tax on insurance plans valued at more than $8,500 for individuals and $23,000 for families. Some economists, including Mr. Aaron, said the provision will prod employers and workers to choose more cost-effective health plans" (Vaughan, 11/19).

Meanwhile, Roll Call reports that "The Congressional Budget Office revised its estimate of the House health care bill Thursday, saying it would shrink the deficit by $139 billion in the first decade, $30 billion more than earlier estimates and $9 billion more than the Senate bill unveiled Wednesday by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)" (Dennis, 11/19).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Biden is right about $35 insulin cap but exaggerates prior costs for Medicare enrollees