<< FDA convenes Advisory Committee meeting to discuss safety of LABA's | Researchers develop new compound to inhibit HIV transmission >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Norsk | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Removal of “no known cure” in house bill reduces SOMB’s power to prioritize public safety

Published on March 22, 2010 at 6:44 AM · 2 Comments

House Bill 10-1364 is scheduled to be heard at the House Judiciary Committee at the Colorado capitol building the afternoon of Thursday, March 25. The bill deals in part with whether to keep the words "no known cure" in an existing statute governing Colorado's Sex Offender Management Board (SOMB). The SOMB oversees the state's treatment program for sex offenders.

“Why is it necessary to have the statute direct the specific orientation of treatment?”

A growing group called the No Known Cure group including Greig Veeder, executive director of Teaching Humane Existence (T.H.E.), leading sex offender management professionals and concerned citizens, believe the bill itself is effective overall because it promotes the continuation of the SOMB. However, they believe the removal of the “no known cure” language reduces the SOMB’s power to prioritize public safety.

The SOMB's statute states that, "...the board shall develop and prescribe a standardized procedure for the evaluation and identification of sex offenders. Such procedure shall provide for an evaluation and identification of the offender and recommend behavior management, monitoring, and treatment based upon the knowledge that sex offenders are extremely habituated and that there is no known cure for the propensity to commit sex abuse."

It is important to note that the language is meant for the management of convicted, repeat adult sex offenders, not low-risk, one-time offenders, developmentally delayed adults, juveniles or women.

"The simple fact is if the house bill removes the three words 'no known cure' it diminishes the strength of our ability to treat, manage and contain convicted, adult repeat sex offenders," said Greig Veeder, executive director for T.H.E. and leading the charge to retain the language. "The people pushing to make this change are family members of sex offenders and defense attorneys. The ones who oppose the bill are committed to public safety and include state probation, Colorado Coalition Against Sex Assault, leading professionals in the field, concerned citizens and victims."

Comments
  1. cajajo cajajo United States says:

    Why take out "no known cure"?  Because it is a flat-out lie.  Period.  This is something victims' rights advocates promote, just like the '2% of victims lie' myth.  The US Dept of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics say otherwise, among many others.

    What this group is doing is promoting fear among the population in order to vilify a segment of society trapped by these draconian laws.  CO courts coerce many innocent men into pleas and convict on hearsay.  Many of these men have families forced to suffer under the SO laws.  Once taxpaying members of society, they have lost income, their homes - everything.  When are you going to become human again?

  2. Public Awareness Public Awareness United States says:

    This is so scary the witch hunt this is going on out there regarding people with a sex offense.  And this issue of the No Known Cure????  Victims Advocates are trying to stir up undue fear in the general public.  Not all persons with a sex offense even need treatment.  It is not a One Size Fits All.  Each person has a different offense and a different sentence.  The persons that are in need of more intense help should get that.  There should be a standarized treatment for the inside as well as the outside so that these people can do their treatment and transition back into society.  Let's not promote PUBLIC FEAR but PUBLIC AWARENESS.  The public should understand what is really going on.  Millions of dollars are being spent to warehouse persons that should have been out years ago.  

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading