AFP reflects on WHO's response to H1N1

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Agence France-Presse examines the WHO's response to H1N1 (swine flu) one year since the virus was first reported in Mexico and the U.S. "A year on, questions linger as to whether a decision by the World Health Organization to declare swine flu a pandemic, thereby unleashing the slew of health measures, was over-dramatic or even tainted by commercial interests," the news service writes.

"The WHO's decision resulted 'in the disruption, the changing of priorities in health services which were concentrating on swine flu instead of concentrating on matters which were far more important to save lives,'" said Paul Flynn, a British parliamentarian who led a Council of Europe inquiry on the WHO's handling of H1N1. "Flynn noted that huge sums were spent on anti-virals and vaccines, which went largely wasted as skeptical populations refused to get vaccinated," the news service adds.

The article highlights the "big winners in the flu episode - pharmaceutical firms," including "Novartis and Roche," which "both reported exceptional results last year thanks to the unexpected boost from vaccine or flu medication orders." It also looks at criticisms by some that the WHO's strategy was influenced by the pharmaceutical industry. Despite such criticisms, the AFP notes "many scientists jumped to the defense of the WHO." 

Virologist and Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry Professor John Oxford said, "A lot of the criticism is political. I've not heard criticism from any virologist."

Still, some "believe that the swine flu episode may have done more harm to the WHO than good," AFP writes. "The great danger is that the world will say, 'You cried wolf, You frightened us about things that didn't happen,' and that the authority of the WHO could be undermined," said Flynn. "If there is a very dangerous virus in future, no one might take notice of the warning and people could die."

The WHO last week concluded the first meeting of a probe into its H1N1 response. A report on the probe is scheduled to be released this fall, according to the news service (Rijckaert, 4/20).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Adeno-associated virus: The gene therapy revolution faces manufacturing and safety hurdles