Birth control pill coverage for church-affiliated institutions sparks outrage

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The Obama administration announced Friday that many church-affiliated institutions will have to cover free birth control for employees. This has sparked debate and invited criticism.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said nonprofit institutions such as church-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social service agencies will have one additional year to comply with the requirement, issued in regulations under President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. “I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services,” Sebelius said in a statement. “Scientists have abundant evidence that birth control has significant health benefits for women,” Ms. Sebelius said, and “it is documented to significantly reduce health costs.”

Religious-affiliated nonprofit organizations, many of which currently do not offer birth control coverage, have until August 1, 2013, to comply with the new rule. Other employers must begin covering the services from August 1, 2012. The government's decision does not apply to churches, synagogues, mosques, temples and some religiously-affiliated elementary and secondary schools, which remain exempt.

Some predicted religious employers would drop coverage for their workers, opting instead to pay fines to the federal government under the health care law. “Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violate their conscience,” said New York Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. “This shouldn’t happen in a land where free exercise of religion ranks first in the Bill of Rights.” Further many religious conservatives consider the morning-after birth control pill to be an abortion drug. The National Association of Evangelicals said that as a result of the White House decision, “Employers with religious objections to contraception will be forced to pay for services and procedures they believe are morally wrong.”

According to officials the administration’s ruling was carefully considered, after reviewing more than 200,000 comments from interested parties and the public. The one-year extension, they said, responds to concerns raised by religious employers about making adjustments. Administration officials stressed individual decisions about whether or not to use birth control, and what kind, remain in the hands of women and their doctors. Obama personally spoke with Dolan on Friday to inform him of the announcement, an administration official said.

Chris Jacobs, a health policy analyst for Senate Republicans, said, “This decision looks suspiciously like yet another political stunt designed to delay the controversy by a year, until after the president’s re-election campaign.” Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, said the transition period was pointless. “The problem is not that religious institutions do not have enough time to comply,” Mr. Hatch said. “It’s that they are forced to comply at all. Unfortunately, the administration has shown a complete lack of regard for our constitutional commitment to religious liberty.”

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). Birth control pill coverage for church-affiliated institutions sparks outrage. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 27, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120123/Birth-control-pill-coverage-for-church-affiliated-institutions-sparks-outrage.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Birth control pill coverage for church-affiliated institutions sparks outrage". News-Medical. 27 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120123/Birth-control-pill-coverage-for-church-affiliated-institutions-sparks-outrage.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Birth control pill coverage for church-affiliated institutions sparks outrage". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120123/Birth-control-pill-coverage-for-church-affiliated-institutions-sparks-outrage.aspx. (accessed April 27, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. Birth control pill coverage for church-affiliated institutions sparks outrage. News-Medical, viewed 27 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120123/Birth-control-pill-coverage-for-church-affiliated-institutions-sparks-outrage.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
At stake in mifepristone case: Abortion, FDA’s authority, and return to 1873 obscenity law