CBO report: Employer-based health insurance could decline under health law

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A new Congressional Budget Office report about employer-based health insurance coverage is generating controversy, and the CBO's director is weighing in.

Modern Healthcare: Employer-Based Coverage Seen Falling Under ACA
Citing a "tremendous amount of uncertainty," a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation found that because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, about 3 million to 5 million fewer people will obtain health insurance coverage through their employer between 2019 and 2022, based on the agencies' latest baseline projections (Zigmond, 3/15).

Politico: CBO: Health Reform Could Cause People To Lose Workplace Coverage
A new report from the Congressional Budget Office hands critics of the health reform law a great new talking point: Under a worst-case scenario, the law could lead to 20 million people losing their employer-sponsored insurance in 2019. The agency doesn't think that's likely, however (Feder, 3/15).

The Fiscal Times: CBO: Big Drop in Health Coverage Unlikely
One report highlighted a "worst case scenario" to claim up to 20 million people could lose coverage. Not so, says the agency. "CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) continue to expect the Affordable Care Act (ACA)-;the health care legislation enacted in March 2010-;will lead to a small reduction in the number of people receiving employment-based health insurance," Director Doug Elmendorf wrote on his blog (Goozner, 3/16). 

CQ HealthBeat: CBO Sees No 'Sharp Decline' In Employer Insurance Under Health Care Law
An analysis the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation issued Thursday says that most employers will continue to have an economic reason to offer health insurance to their workers after the health care law is implemented. It says that a "sharp decline" in employment-based insurance as a result of the law is "unlikely," and even if it occurred it "would not dramatically increase the cost" to the federal budget (Norman, 3/15).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Sign here? Financial agreements may leave doctors in the driver’s seat