Employer-insurer coalition asks HHS to pare essential benefits

Published on January 25, 2013 at 12:28 AM · No Comments

Employers, insurers and health providers worry that requiring expansive coverage in the policies sold in health insurance markets could make insurance unaffordable.

Modern Healthcare: HHS Urged To Keep Essential Benefits Affordable For Small Business
A coalition of business groups, health plans and health care providers is urging HHS to follow private-sector approaches as the department develops a final rule on the essential health benefits that individual and small-group plans must cover as part of the 2010 health care reform law. The Essential Health Benefits Coalition, whose membership includes the National Retail Federation, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, America's Health Insurance Plans, the American Osteopathic Association and the Pharmacy Care Management Association, submitted a list last month of six recommendations to HHS in response to the department's November proposed rule on essential health benefits (Zigmond, 1/23).

CQ Healthbeat: Employers, Insurers Press CMS To Prune Essential Benefits
The growing concern among insurance analysts that coverage will be unaffordable in the new health care exchanges might create a fresh opportunity for federal officials to be persuaded to trim requirements in the final essential health benefits rule, which is expected out in February or March. Employers and insurers certainly hope so. With a few weeks to go before the final version is expected, they held a news briefing Wednesday to highlight six recommendations for shaping the rule in a way that they say makes coverage less costly (Reichard, 1/23).

Premiums for smokers under the health law are also getting attention --

California Healthline: The Premium Conundrum: Do Smokers Get A Fair Break Under Obamacare?
The Affordable Care Act contains a number of provisions intended to incent "personal responsibility," or the notion that health care isn't just a right -- it's an obligation. None of these measures is more prominent than the law's individual mandate, designed to ensure that every American obtains health coverage or pays a fine for choosing to go uninsured. But one provision that's gotten much less attention -- until recently -- relates to smoking; specifically, the ACA allows payers to treat tobacco users very differently by opening the door to much higher premiums for this population. That measure has some health policy analysts cheering, suggesting that higher premiums are necessary to raise revenue for the law and (hopefully) deter smokers' bad habits. But other observers have warned that the ACA takes a heavy-handed stick to smokers who may be unhappily addicted to tobacco, rather than enticing them with a carrot to quit (Diamond, 1/23).

In the meantime, the GOP returns to efforts to repeal parts of the health law in a new Congress --

Modern Healthcare: New Session Of Congress Brings More Anti-Reform Legislation
New year, same resolution. Just weeks into the 113th Congress, GOP lawmakers are making attempts to dismantle the 2010 healthcare law, and one of those efforts has bipartisan support. That's the legislation introduced today by Rep. Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's contentious -- and unpopular -- Independent Payment Advisory Board. Roe, a physician, introduced his bill in the last Congress and more than 230 co-sponsors signed onto it, including 20 Democrats (it later passed as part of other legislation). The bill Roe introduced today currently has 83 original co-sponsors from last year's legislation, and a spokeswoman for Roe said in an e-mail that his office expects the bill to gain support (Zigmond, 1/23).

National Journal: Critics Of Medicare Board Should Be Careful What They Wish For
Of the controversial elements of the president's health reform law, the provision with perhaps the most bipartisan opposition is its Medicare cost-containment board. The Independent Payment Advisory Board, sometimes called a "rationing board" or "death panel" by its detractors, is designed to help control Medicare spending. Its 15 Senate-confirmed members have the authority to craft new Medicare payment policy with the force of law if costs grow faster than a specified rate. What many critics don't realize is that if that 15-person board is not assembled, the law hands a lot of power to the secretary of Health and Human Services (Sanger-Katz).

And a former player in the health law's march through Congress sizes up his new role --

Politico: Nelson: From 60th Vote To ACA's Implementation
As CEO, earning nearly $1 million a year, [former Sen. Ben] Nelson will be a leading intermediary between the states and Washington. The states are trying to implement the wide-ranging law without sinking their health insurance markets -- or giving up too much of their traditional regulatory turf. And the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is working like mad to get the law ready in time for 2014 -- including in states that aren't exactly bending over backward to help (Millman, 1/23).

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

 

Posted in: Healthcare News

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like... ×
Tobacco use linked to oral HPV-16