Minimally invasive spine surgery

By Dr Ezriel E. Kornel, MD

Ezriel E. Kornel ARTICLE IMAGE

The history of spine surgery

For over forty years, lumbar spine (back) surgery was destructive to structures of the spine while at the same time attempting to rectify disorders of the spine. 

In order to gain entry into the spine to decompress nerves and remove herniated discs, bone spurs, thickened ligaments and cysts that compress the nerves, muscle were extensively dissected off of the vertebrae.  This caused disruption to tendons and damage and scarring to the muscles, at times extensive.

Additionally, ligaments holding the vertebrae together had to be removed, weakening the spine. Sizable portions of the vertebral bone, including portions of the joints, were removed to gain access into the spine. This can weaken the spine and expose the nerves to scar tissue that could result in further irritation and compression of nerves.  In order to stabilize the spine when necessary, these disruptive techniques were also utilized. 

There are still occasions when these previously standard techniques need to be utilized.  However, over the past ten years new techniques have been developed that are far less destructive and traumatic to the tissues of the spine.

Minimally invasive spine surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery allows for less trauma and damage to muscles, tendons, ligaments and joints as well as the bones of the spine. It also allows for less damage to any other surrounding tissues. 

The spine is able to be entered through incisions via tubular channels and endoscopes by a camera placed in the tube or with a high-power microscope visualizing directly through the tube. Endoscopes are thin tubular devices connected to cameras. These enable the surgeon to visualize the procedure. In addition, some surgeons may use CT or MRI data to view 3D computer models of their patient’s spine.

Furthermore, conditions that cannot always be managed with minimally invasive technique include some cases of severe degenerative facet disease with severe stenosis and scoliosis and the resection of intraspinal tumors.

The necessary incisions tend to be small. For example, one type of minimally invasive spine surgery called balloon kyphoplasty requires only two needle-size incisions. Furthermore, spinal fusion, a condition that previously required 4-6 inch incisions to be made during traditional open spine surgery, can now be treated using ½-1 inch incisions.

Muscle fibers are separated rather than cut and can resume their normal position after the instruments have been removed. This means that the patient experiences less pain and scarring following minimally invasive spine surgery.

A very limited amount of ligament and bone is resected and at times none needs to be removed. The nerves are exposed to very little scarring.

Screws, rods and clamps that require implantation to stabilize and realign the spine can now be inserted through very small incisions via what are referred to as percutaneous approaches. 

Damaged discs can be removed through very small openings into the disc, at times percutaneously as well. 

Working through these small incisions endoscopes and microscopes can be utilized allowing excellent visualization of nerves, limiting the risk of damage. Interbody devices can then be placed into the disc spaces to maintain the disc space height through these very small openings and can then be expanded within the disc to the desired size.

Artificial discs can be inserted to replace damaged discs via small abdominal incisions precluding any damage to the bones, muscles, tendons and ligaments of the spine. 

It is also now possible to remove a damaged disc and replace it with an interbody device through a small incision in the flank, again avoiding any significant damage to the muscles, ligaments and bone of the spine. New intraoperative x-ray imaging can allow for highly precise computer-guided placement of hardware such as pedicle screws into the spine.

These techniques are continuously being refined and new techniques developed. 

Specialists involved in minimally invasive spine surgery

Many specialists are involved in treating patients that require minimally invasive spinal surgery. These include:

  • Neurosurgeons
  • Orthopedic surgeons
  • Diagnostic imaging staff
  • Pain management physicians
  • Nurses
  • Physical therapists

What spinal disorders is minimally invasive spine surgery available for?

There are a number of spinal disorders for which minimally invasive surgery is available. These include:

  • Herniated discs
  • Degenerative spinal disease
  • Fractures
  • Tumors
  • Spondylosis
  • Scoliosis
  • Stenosis
  • Pseudoarthrosis
  • Kyphosis
  • Spinal instability
  • Osteomyelitis /discitis
  • Post-laminectomy syndrome
  • Injuries to the spinal column

What problems cannot be treated using minimally invasive spine surgery?

Some conditions cannot currently be treated using minimally invasive spinal surgery. This may be due to a number of reasons including the complexity of the condition and the time taken to carry out the surgical procedure.

For example, patients with severe stenosis secondary to facet hypertrophy may not be able to be treated using minimally invasive spinal surgery as surgeons may require posterior access.

Types of minimally invasive spine surgery

The following procedures may be performed using minimally invasive spinal surgery:-

  • Fusion including Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF), Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF), Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), Posterolateral fusion and Revision fusion
  • Discectomy
  • Foraminotomy including Posterior cervical Foraminotomy and Lamino-foraminotomy
  • Costotransversectomy
  • Spinal fusion with Bone Morphogenetic Protein
  • Anterior thoracoscopic correction
  • Vertebroplasty
  • Kyphoplasty
  • Disk electrocauterization

Benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery allows for faster recovery and often patients can now go home the same day of surgery. Previously, patients had to remain in the hospital four to five days following open spine surgery.

Blood loss is generally greatly reduced and the overall stress on the body is less pronounced. In addition, the risk of infection is lower. There are also less visible scars.

Most importantly, with less damage to tissues of the spine the potential deleterious effects of spine surgery are minimized and the likelihood of injury to nerves both in the short term as well as long term is reduced.

Another benefit of minimally invasive spine surgery is that it may be performed on patients that were formerly considered poor candidates for open spine surgery.

Complications of minimally invasive spine surgery

Minimally invasive spine surgery is technically complex and according to Kim, Siemionow et al. “a significant complication rate has been reported during a surgeon’s initial learning curve for the procedures.”

Sources

  1. http://www.uchospitals.edu/specialties/minisurgery/spine/
  2. http://neurosurgery.ucsf.edu/index.php/spinal_disorders_minimally_invasive_surgery.html
  3. http://health.ucsd.edu/specialties/neuro/specialty-programs/spine-center/Pages/minimally-invasive-spine-surgery-types.aspx
  4. http://neurosurgery.med.miami.edu/video-gallery/minimally-invasive-spine-surgery/
  5. http://www.cedars-sinai.edu/Patients/Programs-and-Services/Spine-Center/Conditions-and-Treatments/Treatments/Surgical-Treatments/Minimally-Invasive-Spine-Surgery.aspx
  6. http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/neurosurgery/minimallyinvasive
  7. http://medicine.yale.edu/neurosurgery/clinical/spine/surgeries.aspx
  8. http://www.neurosurgery.pitt.edu/spine/minimal/lateral.html
  9. http://gsm.utmck.edu/prospective/articles/Frontiers%20Articles%20-%20Minimmally%20Invasive%20Surgery.pdf
  10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21553786

About Dr Ezriel E. Kornel

Ezriel E. Kornel BIG IMAGENeurosurgeon Ezriel E. Kornel MD is in the forefront of minimally invasive neurosurgery (MIS), which is used to minimize the trauma of surgery and increase the speed of recovery.

Dr. Kornel also is an expert in minimally invasive endoscopic surgery of the spine as well as minimally invasive approaches in the surgical treatment of brain tumors. He was involved in the early development of surgical instruments used in endoscopic and minimally-invasive spine surgery, and has taught these techniques to other spine surgeons.

Additionally, Dr. Kornel is one of the first neurosurgeons in the New York metropolitan area to replace damaged cervical discs with artificial discs, newly-introduced to the market. He is one of the first spine surgeons in the New York/New Jersey/Connecticut area to perform percutaneous lumbar fusions, and he introduced frameless stereotaxic guided cranial surgery in Westchester County, New York hospitals to allow for less invasive brain surgery.

A patent is pending on instruments Dr. Kornel invented for percutaneous spine fusion surgery. He has authored scientific articles relating to neurosurgery and has authored a chapter in an online textbook regarding management of cervical spine trauma.

Dr. Kornel gained his initial expertise during his neurosurgical residency at the George Washington University Medical Center under the tutelage of Hugo Rizzoli, M.D., who, at the time, was one of the most renowned and respected neurosurgeons in the world. When in Stockholm, Dr. Kornel trained and is certified in the use of the Gamma Knife, a stereotactic radio-surgical technique he uses for the treatment of brain tumors and trigeminal neuralgia.

In 1981, he was part of the team that treated James Brady, press secretary to President Reagan, when Mr. Brady sustained a devastating gunshot wound during the assassination attempt on the president. Dr. Kornel’s work was cited numerous times in the biography of James Brady.


Disclaimer: This article has not been subjected to peer review and is presented as the personal views of a qualified expert in the subject in accordance with the general terms and condition of use of the news-medical.net website.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski
Comments
  1. p pillay p pillay Singapore says:

    This is an excellent review and I fully agree  that we spine specialists need to provide less invasive , safe and effective spine solutions for our patients.

    Dr Prem Pillay
    Director of Spine Sevices

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post