<< Alzheimer Society of Canada new Alzheimer fact sheet | Possible new SARS case in Beijing, China >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Ελληνικά | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Statement on patient safety principles for office-based surgery

Published on April 22, 2004 at 7:09 PM · No Comments

Over the past few years, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of invasive procedures being performed in the office setting. Recognizing that many states still haven't issued patient safety guidelines in this area, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) sponsored a resolution, which was passed at the American Medical Association's (AMA's) December 2002 Interim Meeting of its House of Delegates.

In brief, the resolution called on the AMA to work with the ACS in "convening a work group of interested specialty societies and state medical associations to identify specific requirements for optimal office-based procedures and utilize those requirements to develop guidelines and model state legislation for use by state regulatory authorities to assure quality of office-based procedures."

On February 5, 2003, the ACS convened a meeting of interested surgical specialty societies to discuss the surgical community's perspective on this issue. In addition, the College invited representatives from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) to provide information and guidance regarding ASA's anesthesia guidelines. As a result of this meeting, a majority of the surgical community reached consensus on a set of 10 core principles that states should examine when moving to regulate office-based procedures.

Having observed the College's catalytic efforts in this area, the AMA quickly followed suit with a March 17, 2003, meeting of interested parties including: surgical and medical specialty societies; state medical associations; the National Committee on Quality Assurance; and the major accrediting organizations for ambulatory and office-based surgery (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations [JCAHO], Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, Inc. [AAAHC], American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgical Facilities, Inc. [AAAASF], and the American Osteopathic Association [AOA]). The March meeting, which was held in consultation with the ACS, used the 10 principles from the College's meeting as the foundation for discussion and debate.

The AMA meeting was co-chaired by LaMar S. McGinnis, Jr., MD, FACS, of the ACS and Clair Callan, MD, of the AMA. The discussion focused on a walk-through of the College's principle document with the work group debating the merits of each principle. After a few minor changes, the members of the work group unanimously approved the revised set of 10 principles.

The following principles were based on a document that was unanimously agreed to by the following groups during a March 17, 2003, ACS/AMA coordinated consensus meeting on office-based surgery:

Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care, American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, American Academy of Dermatology, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, American Society of General Surgeons, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Urological Association, Federation of State Medical Boards, Indiana State Medical Society, Institute for Medical Quality-California Medical Association, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Kansas Medical Society, Massachusetts Medical Society, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Medical Society of the State of New York, Missouri State Medical Association, National Committee for Quality Assurance, Pennsylvania Medical Society, and Society of Interventional Radiology.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading