<< Was the "ABC" approach responsible for Uganda's decline in HIV? | Wearing a bike helmet might make a car collision more likely >>
Read in | English | Italiano

SARS: Systematic review of treatment effects

Published on September 12, 2006 at 3:46 AM · 1 Comment

The SARS virus set alarm bells ringing across the world when it first appeared in 2002, but now a review of the effectiveness of the treatments used against it has found no evidence that any of them worked.

The review was commissioned by the World Health Organization and has been published in PLoS Medicine.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a virus; the main symptoms are pneumonia and fever. The virus is passed on when people sneeze or cough. In 2003 there were over 8,000 cases and 774 deaths worldwide. The situation was alarming, because the first ever cases only appeared in 2002, in China, and so the best way to treat this new disease was unknown.

Not many drugs are effective against viruses and all doctors can usually do with a viral disease is to treat symptoms like fever and inflammation, and rely on the body's own immune system to fight off the virus. However, in recent years a number of antiviral drugs have been developed (for example, there are several in use against HIV/AIDS) and there was hope that some of them might be active against SARS. Steroids have also been used in SARS treatment to try to reduce the inflammation of the lungs. To find out which, if any, of the potential treatments were effective, a number of research studies were carried out, both during and since the outbreak.

The World Health Organization (WHO) established an International SARS Treatment Study Group, which recommended that a 'systematic review' of potential SARS treatments should be carried out. In particular, it was considered important to bring together all the available evidence on the use of certain antiviral drugs (ribavirin, lopinavir and ritonavir), steroids, and proteins called immunoglobulins which are found naturally in human blood. The WHO group wanted to know how these treatments affected the virus outside the body ('in vitro') and whether it helped the condition of patients and reduced the death rate, especially in those patients who developed a dangerous complication called acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Comments
  1. Greg Molenaar Greg Molenaar United States says:

                     SARS:

    I'm not so much afraid of SARS,
       But rather, people driving cars.
    For there's more dangers in the street
       From crazy drivers that you meet!

    Who knows what liquors they've been drinking
       Or what could be their lack of thinking.
    Traffic accidents in every city
       Take greater toll of lives, a pity!

      While Severe Acute Respit'ry Disease is
         Well-contained with covered sneezes.

                     -- Greg Molenaar
                        New London, Minnesota USA
                         23 May 2003

    (A frequent visitor to China, Molenaar will return annually during the flu season)

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading