<< The puzzle of mystery dizziness solved | Pregnant women need to know cesareans are risk >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Battle looming between NHS and pharma giants

Published on February 20, 2007 at 6:07 AM · No Comments

According to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) in Britain, the National Health Service (NHS) is paying far too much to drug companies for branded medicines.

The competition watchdog has apparently had it's eye on the system by which the Department of Health spends £7bn on branded medicines, since September 2005.

It appears that a secretive price-fixing scheme operated between the Department of Health and the major pharmaceutical companies, has resulted in the NHS spending millions of pounds more than it should have for drugs.

The OFT has reached the conclusion that the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) should be overhauled, as the scheme does not allow the NHS to get the best prices.

The OFT is calling for a far more transparent system, which could lead to lower prices for innovative medicines such as Herceptin when they first arrive on the market.

Even though the Department of Health is not obliged to accept the OFT's recommendations, they are unlikely to reject them, as hundreds of millions of pounds of public money are at stake here.

What is to be expected is a major confrontation with the major drug companies, who frequently complain that the NHS does not spend enough on their products.

The PPRS sets a cap on the profits that each drug company can earn on its annual sales of branded medicines to the NHS by way of a voluntary scheme negotiated every five years between the Department of Health and the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.

The price which is set for the NHS drugs is often used as a benchmark by health services in other countries, who frequently negotiate a better deal.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading