Although men and women attend medical school in equal numbers, for most women who go on to academic medicine, that's where the numbers stop adding up.
Just twelve percent of women faculty members are promoted to full professor, compared with one-third of male faculty.
Furthermore, in the nation's 125 medical schools, on average there are only thirty-five women full professors compared with 188 male full professors per school. Finally, women hold only eight percent of clinical science department chairs and eight percent of deanships.
Against this backdrop, the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health have called “for an urgent broad national effort” to maximize the potential of women faculty in medicine and the biomedical sciences.
Tufts University School of Medicine along with four leading medical schools and the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), support this effort. Launching a five-year study to explore and address the dramatic under-representation of women and minority faculty in leadership and senior positions in academic medicine, “The National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine”, (also known as “C–Change” for cultural change) is supported by a $1.4 million grant from the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation of New York.
“Lack of women representation in leadership roles within in the physical sciences is a real problem. As we continue to educate and train the female physicians and researchers of the future, we must encourage and support their career paths towards leadership and academic careers,” said Michael Rosenblatt, MD, Dean, Tufts University School of Medicine.
“Everyone knows there is a problem, but we do not as yet have full and reliable answers to correct it,” said principal investigator Linda Pololi, MD, a senior scientist and resident scholar at the Women's Studies Research Center at Brandeis.
“Many women physicians and scientists believe that the current organization and culture of academic medicine disadvantages them, preventing them from reaching key decision-making positions,” Pololi explained. “We are looking at these concerns in a comprehensive way, using both in-depth qualitative and quantitative research methods.”