<< Rosacea the result of a trifecta of unfortunate factors | 7-step guide to understanding tonsils and strep >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Abstinence only sex programmes - a waste of government money?

Published on August 6, 2007 at 8:11 AM · No Comments

The latest research confirms and supports earlier work which has stated that programmes which exclusively advocate abstinence from sex in order to stop risky sexual behaviour or help in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy, are ineffective.

The researchers from Oxford University in the UK found abstinence only sex programmes had no negative or positive impact on the rates of sex infections or unprotected sex and did not appear to affect the risk of HIV infection in high income countries.

The Oxford team reviewed 13 U.S. trials involving over 15,000 people aged 10 to 21 and their conclusions question the continued use of public money to fund abstinence only programmes especially in the United States.

Abstinence only programmes encourage sexual abstinence as the exclusive means of preventing HIV infection, without promoting safer sex behaviours, but their effectiveness in high income settings has been unclear.

Abstinence-only programmes are very popular in the U.S. and also have their supporters in the UK, but such programmes fail say experts because they provide no safety net for young people who do have a sexual relationship, which many do.

A third of President Bush's HIV budget for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) is given to abstinence only programmes which severely limits the funding available for other safer sex strategies.

The study, which included trials comparing young people attending abstinence-only programmes to those receiving no sex education, raises questions over whether they work in developed countries.

The researchers found that none of the abstinence-only programmes had any impact on the age at which individuals lost their virginity, whether they had unprotected sex, the number of sexual partners, the rates of sexually transmitted diseases or the number of pregnancies.

An earlier review had already examined programme effectiveness in low income countries, which led the University of Oxford researchers to review 13 trials involving over 15,000 U.S. youths in order to assess the effects of abstinence only programmes in high income countries.

The programmes aimed to prevent HIV infection or HIV and pregnancy and measured self reported biological and behavioural outcomes such as sexually transmitted infection, pregnancy, frequency of unprotected sex, number of partners, and sexual initiation.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading