A study tracking nearly 1,000 over-75s at high risk of stroke has found that the anticoagulant drug warfarin cuts the risk by half in this older population without causing more side-effects than alternatives.
The patients in the trial had a heart complaint called atrial fibrillation – an abnormal heart rhythm – which is a major risk factor for stroke. 12% of over-75s are affected by this condition.
While warfarin has been hailed as the best approach in younger people, its blood-thinning properties were feared to pose greater risks to the very old, potentially causing severe bleeds.
In an effort to assess the suitability of warfarin for stroke prevention in this specific population, Medical Research Council researchers at the University of Birmingham found the drug was twice as effective as aspirin while being no more dangerous. Their findings are published in The Lancet .
Another major risk factor is increasing age. Hence managing the risk of stroke in older populations is crucial. Yet until now no large trial had been conducted to look at the risks and benefits of the two main methods of reducing stroke risk – aspirin and warfarin – exclusively in those over 75 years of age.
Although trials had found that warfarin was more effective than aspirin in previous trials, older patients had been severely under-represented in these trials and concerns that the anticoagulant would lead to greater instances of severe haemorrhaging put off many doctors from prescribing warfarin to older patients.
The Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study (BAFTA), led by Dr Jonathan Mant and Professor Richard Hobbs at the University of Birmingham tracked over-75s being treated with either aspirin or warfarin over three years. Among those given warfarin, 24 suffered strokes, other brain haemorrhages or clots, compared with 48 of those on aspirin, making warfarin twice as effective.
What is more they found no evidence that warfarin was more hazardous than aspirin in this specific age-group, with the number of bleeding events the same in both groups. There was no difference in the mortality of the two groups.