Has NHS programme for reforming doctors' training lost its way?

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In this week's BMJ, father and son, Anthony and George Madden discuss Modernising Medical Careers, the programme of reform of junior doctors' training, and ask is it still fit for purpose?

Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) began as an attempt to address longstanding problems with the senior house officer grade, say Dr Anthony Madden, Senior Clinical Lecturer in Anaesthesia at the University of Bristol, and George Madden, a final year medical student at the University of Birmingham (now a Foundation Year 1 doctor in the West Midlands).  But it has since expanded in scope to reform all levels of postgraduate medical training and bears little resemblance to the proposals that were approved during consultations.

There is now a real danger, they warn, that it will deliver a generation of highly specialised doctors who lack the breadth of experience and flexibility that will enable them to manage unusual clinical problems or change as medicine advances.  This cannot be good for patients, NHS employers or the Government.

So, has MMC lost its way?

The current plans are disappointing for doctors, who need a robust, modern training system which satisfies the 'five principles' for reform, they explain.  Specialist training will not be as broadly based as originally envisaged, nor will it be easy to move between programmes.  The idea of individually tailored programmes also seems to have been forgotten, career advice is currently lacking, and the provision for flexible training is uncertain.

MMC therefore fails to meet most of the principles on which it was supposed to be based, they write.

For workforce planners, MMC will mean a reduction in the number of Senior House Officers, their most flexible medical staff, and a reduction in their time spent providing a service in favour of training.  A workforce made up of doctors forced into specialties they did not really want is not a happy prospect either.

It's better news for the government, which will see its 'increasing need for hospital services to be delivered by fully trained doctors' met by the shorter training, and thus longer time spent as a consultant.

However, the consequences for patients are not good. Consultants produced by MMC will have less experience than those trained in the past, they will have a more limited range of expertise, and be less able to meet the increasingly complex needs of patients, they warn.

They end by saying it is difficult not to conclude that MMC has lost its way and will not fulfil its original aims.

Article: Has Modernising Medical Careers lost its way? by George B P Madden and Anthony P Madden BMJ 2007;335:426-428 (1 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39300.591632.DE

There is now a real danger that MMC will deliver a generation of highly specialised doctors who lack the breadth of experience and flexibility that will enable them to manage unusual clinical problems or change as medicine advances.

Dr Anthony Madden

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...