DNA vaccine for SARS achieves neutralizing responses in first U.S. human trial

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Vical Incorporated has announced that results from a Phase I clinical trial of a DNA vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and published in the November 25 issue of Vaccine, demonstrated that the vaccine was well-tolerated, and induced neutralizing antibody responses in 80% of the vaccinees and T-cell immune responses in all vaccinees.

The Phase I trial was initiated with unprecedented speed, within 19 months of the publication of the SARS coronavirus genetic sequence from which the vaccine was derived, and was the first SARS vaccine human clinical trial conducted in the United States.

The DNA vaccine was developed by the Vaccine Research Center (VRC), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), NIH, and manufactured by Vical. Three doses of 4 mg each were delivered on Days 0, 28 and 56 with the Biojector(R) 2000 needle-free injection system (Bioject Medical Technologies Inc., OTC Bulletin Board: BJCT). In the article, authors from the VRC detailed safety and immunogenicity results, and concluded, "This vaccine also demonstrates the feasibility of rapid manufacturing and regulatory review and provides additional safety and immunogenicity data to support the concept of DNA vaccination as a potential vaccine platform for future emerging infectious diseases."

After completion of the NIH Phase I clinical trial, NIAID transferred the Investigational New Drug application (IND) for the vaccine to Vical, and the company has evaluated its options to continue development of the vaccine when a medical need arises. "Like many emerging infectious diseases, SARS is suspected of having origins in an animal reservoir and is therefore likely to re-emerge at some point in the future," said Vijay Samant, Vical's President and Chief Executive Officer. "With the data from this successful Phase I trial and control of the IND, we are prepared to advance this vaccine quickly in the event of another outbreak. In the meantime, we can look to the model established with this program in addressing other emerging infectious diseases."

Side effects in the Phase I trial were typically mild, and no serious adverse events were reported. SARS-specific neutralizing antibody responses were detected in 8 of 10 subjects. SARS-specific CD4+ T-cell responses were detected in all 10 subjects, and CD8+ T-cell responses were detected in 2 of 10 subjects. Neutralizing antibody responses are important in preventing infection. CD4+ T cells help direct the appropriate immune resources against specific pathogens. CD8+ T cells find and kill infected cells and are important in clearing virus after infection.

Following the initial cases of SARS, identified in the Guangdong Province of China in late 2002, the disease spread rapidly through the summer of 2003 and reached epidemic status, affecting more than 8,000 and killed more than 900 people in 25 countries before it was contained. SARS affects the respiratory system and gastrointestinal tract as well as other internal organs, with particular risk to the elderly and immunocompromised. Healthy adults may become infected and spread the disease without exhibiting any symptoms.

DNA vaccines may offer both technical and economic advantages compared with conventional vaccine approaches. DNA vaccines encode certain proteins associated with a target pathogen, rather than using any part of the pathogen itself, and can prime the immune system as well as induce antibody and T-cell immune responses. DNA vaccines contain no viral particles, are non-infectious, and can be administered on a repeat basis without unwanted immune responses. Additionally, DNA vaccines have the potential to achieve proof of concept more quickly and cost-effectively than conventional vaccines, and can be manufactured using uniform methods of fermentation and purification, allowing significantly faster development and production.

http://www.vical.com/

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Link between aldehydes and premature aging revealed