<< U.S., Russia to cooperate on health goals | Children's hospital a model for benefits, struggles of health IT >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | Finnish | Русский | Svenska | Polski

Need for Federal insurance Czar questioned

Published on July 7, 2009 at 9:12 PM · No Comments

"Health care overhaul legislation from President Barack Obama's congressional allies would create a federal insurance czar with sweeping new powers to oversee medical plans nationwide, an idea already drawing fierce criticism," The Associated Press reports. "State insurance commissioners are objecting, saying it would duplicate what they now do without offering any better protection for consumers. Conservatives are calling it a textbook example of a big government mentality."

"The insurance czar, known as the Health Choices Commissioner, would head a new independent agency called for in the 800-page draft bill released by House Democratic leaders. The Health Choices Administration would regulate a revamped insurance marketplace and be expected to deliver Obama's promise of affordable coverage for all." State insurance commissioners, "who traditionally have overseen the health insurance industry" say the state regulatory system works the way it is, but the Consumers Union counters that "not every state does a good job of overseeing the insurance industry." Conservatives say the health czar proposal is "a federal power grab."

"The commissioner and the health choices agency would oversee something called the health insurance exchange. That's a new kind of national purchasing pool through which individuals and small businesses could pick medical coverage from a range of private plans and a government-sponsored alternative. The House legislation would eventually open up the insurance exchange to all employers. The commissioner would get to decide when that happens." Responsibilities would include determining "who qualifies for federal subsidies to help buy coverage," setting "standards for handling grievances and appeals for claims denied," determining "plan benefits for each year," policing "insurance marketing campaigns," and enforcing "a requirement that the insurers spend on medical care at least 85 percent of what they collect in premiums." It is not known "whether the Senate will follow the House's lead on the federal health insurance czar. Senators are talking about setting federal standards for health insurance, but delegating enforcement to the states" (Alonso-Zaldivar, 7/7).

Meanwhile, polling data shows widespread support for Obama's national health care proposal, "but if history and polling trends are any guide, however, that will change," The Washington Post reports. Pollster Daniel Yankelovich says voters are in the "Wishful Thinking stage," but "in the next few weeks, when voters discover what national health care will cost and how it could affect their own care, romance will give way to reality." In mid-June, a New York Times-CBS News poll found that "Americans favor by more than 3 to 1 'the government offering everyone a government-administered health insurance plan that would compete with private health insurance plans.'" But the polls were completed before the Congressional Budget Office scored Sen. Edward Kennedy's reform bill and found that "the bill would increase the federal deficit by $1 trillion over the next decade yet make only a dent in the number of uninsured." A mid-June poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation had similar findings.

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading