<< Doctors can be frustrated, confused by health care system | Change in Heparin manufacturing - expected to decrease the potency >>
Read in | English | 繁體中文

Fact check: Canadian versus. U.S. systems; AARP claims

Published on October 1, 2009 at 8:18 PM · No Comments

The Associated Press examines rhetoric and reality in the case of a Canadian who came to the U.S. for health care.

The AP reports: "Shona Holmes is the Harry and Louise of this year's health care debate, only unlike the fictional folks who memorably trashed the Clinton-era health plan in advocacy ads 15 years ago, Holmes is real. But her story? It's not quite the slam-dunk indictment of socialized medicine that's been portrayed by Republican lawmakers and their allies."

"Holmes, a Canadian living under that country's single-payer system, has said flatly that her brain tumor would have killed her if she'd accepted her fate in Canada — a wait of four months for one specialist and six months for another. Instead she went to the U.S. and had successful surgery. But she never had cancer — a fact routinely omitted by the advocates who have seized on her case. Technically, she didn't have a tumor, either. She had a benign cyst that was apparently threatening her eyesight. Holmes' decision to come to the U.S. exposed her both to the best of American health care and the worst: its capacity for prompt, advanced treatment for complicated conditions, and its staggering expense" (Woodward, 9/30).

Politifact checked up on several claims regarding AARP, and found one about AARP and its sales of insurance "half true"  and another, involving Humana and AARP's message to seniors, "false" (Holan, 9/30). 

Comments
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading