VA's reliance on for-profit health care providers is straining medical center budgets, says Union

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The American Federation of Government Employees today told Congress that the Department of Veterans Affairs' over reliance on private for-profit health care providers is straining medical center budgets and jeopardizing veterans' health care. AFGE represents 180,000 employees on the frontlines of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Health care contracts are one of the many tools available to the VA to increase access for rural veterans and to address other gaps in care. However, "the VA often fails to adequately consider the risks of contract care, as compared to other options," said Mary A. Curtis, a psychiatric clinic nurse specialist and 1st vice-president of AFGE Local 1273 at the Boise VA Medical Center, who delivered the testimony before the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

According to the union, contract care requires that the VA give up a certain degree of control to for-profit outside entities. The use of these for-profit providers leaves the VA less able to control costs, quality of care, provider qualifications, and medical privacy or to ensure that care is timely. In the long term, this may compromise the VA's capacity to provide veterans with a full range of services, as well as its exemplary research and medical education programs.

Congress clearly recognized these privatization risks when it enacted legislation that authorizes contract care in very limited circumstances, when care is not available from the VA. Unfortunately, medical center directors seeking short term fixes for patient wait lists and staff shortages often ignore these criteria and opt for fee basis care and other costly contract care arrangements without adequately considering alternatives that would better serve the veteran and the VA health care system. As a result, in many cases, the VA ends up spending more on for-profit contract care than it would cost to more fully staff the VA health care workforce.

In its study of the VA's Fee Program (VA OIG Report No. 08-02901-185), the VA Office of the Inspector General found that VA medical centers have made large numbers of improper payments for fee care. These findings mirror concerns previously voiced by AFGE, including a strong recommendation that the VA strengthen controls over its for-profit contract program to reduce payment, justification, and authorization errors.

During her testimony, Curtis also criticized the VA's continued expansion of the pilot for-profit contract program, Project HERO. Through a contract with health care giant HUMANA, the VA launched Project HERO as a pilot program in 2007. The program essentially injects an additional private contract layer in the contact care process through the use of for-profit care coordinators, who manage the referral of veterans to health care providers outside the VA. The idea of contractors managing other contractors is ludicrous on its face. "These contractors provide little or no value added to the VA health care system. In some cases, veterans end up traveling even further to HERO providers and the VA ends up paying more to Humana than it would if it had contracted directly with providers without an intermediary," said Curtis.

In Curtis' testimony, AFGE called on the VA to comply with a new directive from the Office of Management of Budget that directs federal agencies to end their over reliance on contractors, conduct an inventory of current contracts and "insource" or bring back in-house work that is more appropriately handled by the government. AFGE also recommended the use of joint labor-management training on the VA's for-profit contract care program to enable front line health care employees to monitor decisions to contract out care. Finally, AFGE requested that Congress withhold funding for the fourth and fifth option years of Project HERO and prevent further expansion of the pilot, pending an investigation of its actual costs, its impact on health care quality can access, and its effect on the VA's own capacity to provide veterans with the services they need.

Comments

  1. K9USAFRet K9USAFRet United States says:

    I listened to the testimony and it seemed more focused on saying they (she) had not been included by management in the pre- and post-contract writing and evaluation process.  AFGE takes a "we want more union employees for more union dues, for more power to exclude vets from being hired, without considering the long-term costs for benefits, retirement, space, building costs, et. al.  Another special interest group being spun by liberal media as the heroes.  They are part of the problem.  I don't believe technical medical specialties are part of the union, so how is it her comments are associated with it?

  2. James King James King United States says:

    I agree with USAFRet. I am in the middle of many health problems and I know I need information on doctors and hospitals. The VA makes it impossible to find out who is better: hospitals and doctors. If you read the VAOIG reports then you know that criminal negligence and fraud happens on a regular basis, procedures are not followed there is insufficient data for conclusions about who was responsible in someone’s death. Now it has been announced that certain VAOIG health inspections will never be available to veterans again once people started finding out what a disgrace that the VA Medical Centers and Nursing Homes are. Heck, half the time the forms are not filled out about who did what and where and when. Having in place guidelines and regulations and policy that is not followed on a regular basis is scary. It took me two years to prove to the VAMC I have to go to that I had heart disease and digestive diseases. Why you ask? Because they did not believe me when I told them so. I went to private doctors to get the diagnosis verified the paperwork would not get entered into their electronic system until over 24 months later after several attempts by me to get it into the system. The CD that had the calcium scoring scan from UNC Chapel Hill also was refused repeatedly (I was told it might have a virus). The stills of the video of my digestive upper and lower areas were not entered because I was told they could not properly scan them. I have had doctors who were great and some who out and out lied. For several years I have had substantial problems with the VAMC after fighting the VA itself for years to get rated for all of my combat related injuries/diseases. If I had a health care card like the members of congress or even the VA union members I would never walk into another VAMC again. I feel every member of congress and the unions and the residents that work there from the Universities should have no choice but to use the VA Medical Centers for their care, only then will anything change. It is a national disgrace that those who fought when asked have to have worse healthcare than those who sent them into combat in the first place. I volunteered but I will never see my child grow up with the level of care I received and continue to receive most of the time.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Uniting Against Antimicrobial Resistance: An Interview with the World Health Organization