<< Biggest Loser implements MedGem indirect calorimeter to assess metabolic changes in program contestants | First Edition: January 7, 2010 >>
Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Nederlands | עִבְרִית | Bahasa | Русский | Svenska | Polski

CFIDS Association of America issues statement in response to XMRV study

Published on January 7, 2010 at 7:02 AM · 1 Comment

The CFIDS Association of America issued the following statement in response to a study published in today’s edition of PLoS One that failed to detect the XMRV virus in banked samples drawn from 186 CFS patients in the United Kingdom. A study published Oct. 8, 2009 in Science reported that 68 of 101 CFS patients from clinics in the U.S. tested positive for XMRV.

“Without a standardized method of detecting XMRV, millions of dollars might be wasted on independent attempts to determine the prevalence of XMRV in different populations.”

“The CFIDS Association of America reviewed the study published in today’s edition of PLoS One. We are concerned about many elements of this study including differences between the patients selected by the two groups, different processes used to collect and test the blood samples, and the rapid nature of the new publication, as evidenced by the three days that separated the dates of submission and acceptance,” stated K. Kimberly McCleary, president and CEO of the CFIDS Association of America. “We urge the media and the research and patient communities to view these findings in the context of evolving understanding and to insist upon more rigorous and standardized replication studies before drawing conclusions about the role of XMRV in the pathophysiology of CFS.”

Comments
  1. Jane Farmer Jane Farmer United States says:

    I am unclear as to why a study would be released without following proper protocol for proper research testing. Anytime medical research is done, one must control the variables between the 2 studies if you are going to compare one study against another.  Methodology must be consistent or the study compatsion os invalid. I'm surprised that these researcher did not know this. Were they really that anxious to put CFS back into the psychiatric arena. I would hope not. Let's work together and get it right.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.



  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading