WHO Director-General responds to criticisms over agency's H1N1 response

Published on June 11, 2010 at 1:53 AM · No Comments

WHO Director-General Margaret Chan on Tuesday rejected recent criticisms that her decisions to declare H1N1 (swine flu) a pandemic were impacted by her advisers' link to the pharmaceutical industry, the Associated Press reports.

"At no time, not for one second, did commercial interests enter my decision-making," Chan wrote in a letter to the editors of BMJ, which last week published a report that "questioned the way WHO managed conflicts of interest among its scientific advisers and the transparency of its advice to governments" (Engeler, 6/9).

In her statement, Chan also takes on the argument that the WHO's handling of H1N1 had unnecessarily "provoked unjustified fear."

"…[W]hen I announced the start of the pandemic, I drew attention to the fact that the worldwide number of deaths was small, and clearly stated that we did not expect to see a sudden and dramatic jump in the number of severe or fatal infections," Chan writes. "In every assessment of the pandemic, WHO consistently reminded the public that the overwhelming majority of patients experienced mild symptoms and made a rapid and full recovery, even without medical treatment" (6/8).

"…[D]ecisions to raise the level of pandemic alert were based on clearly defined virological and epidemiological criteria," Chan said, the Globe and Mail reports. "It is hard to bend these criteria, no matter what the motive."

In the statement, Chan also defended the decision to allow the members of an emergency committee that advises her on H1N1 to remain anonymous until their work is complete (Alphonso, 6/8) and pointed to an ongoing review of the WHO's performance in response to H1N1 as a sign of her agency's openness to criticism, Indo-Asian News Service/Hindustan Times reports.

"The [review] committee agreed to address criticism currently being levelled at WHO as part of its evaluation," Chan said. "I have publicly expressed my desire to see a critical, independent and transparent assessment of WHO's performance," she added (6/9).

According to Harvey Fineberg, the president of the Institute of Medicine and head of the review panel, the committee "will hear from critics of WHO when it next meets from June 30 to July 2," the AP writes.

In related news, Nature News/Scientific American reports on several challenges to the claims presented in the BMJ report. Among several points, the piece reflects on the argument presented that the declaration of H1N1 to be a pandemic "triggered the contracts" with pharmaceutical companies.

Read in | English | Español | Français | Deutsch | Português | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 简体中文 | 繁體中文 | Dansk | Nederlands | Filipino | Русский | Svenska | Polski
The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment