New study refutes common assumptions about consent forms in clinical trials

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Sociodemographic variables also do not seem to affect comprehension

Although informed consent is an ethical cornerstone in research with humans, some studies suggests that volunteers often do not understand key aspects of the research in which they participate. Recent efforts have been made to improve informed consent by simplifying the consent forms.

A new study refutes two common assumptions about consent forms: that the length and complexity of forms affect comprehension and that people who are paid to enroll in research may be "blinded by money" and thus ignore key details of the study.

In a randomized controlled trial of a standard versus concise consent form for a low-risk phase I bioequivalence study of a marketed drug, the authors found that overall comprehension was comparable - and high - with both forms. Furthermore, the shorter form appeared to have no adverse effect on the quality of informed consent. Another intriguing finding was that comprehension was slightly higher among the paid volunteers than those who were unpaid. And, the study revealed that the overall comprehension scores of socioeconomically disadvantaged participants was good, negating the common claim that this population of research participants requires special protections.

The report of the study appeared in IRB: Ethics & Human Research, published by The Hastings Center. The authors include two Hastings Center Fellows and bioethics leaders in the federal government: Ezekiel Emanuel, head of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and special advisor for health policy to the director of the White House Office of Management and Budget; and Christine Grady, acting chief of the Department of Bioethics at the NIH Clinical Center and a member of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Other authors are Leanne Stunkel and Ninet Sinaii, of the NIH Department of Bioethics; and Meredith Benson, Louise McLellan, and Garbriella Bedarida, of Pfizer.

Although informed consent is an ethical cornerstone in research with humans, some studies suggest that volunteers often don't understand key aspects of the research. Recent efforts have been made to improve informed consent by simplifying the consent forms. A new study refutes two common assumptions about consent forms: that the length and complexity of forms affect comprehension and that people who are paid to enroll in research may be "blinded by money" and thus ignore key details of the study.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Microfluidic chips advance neurodegenerative disease research