Medical loss ratio rules for insurers could bring controversy to Sebelius' office

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Once the National Association of Insurance Commissioners finalizes recommendations on insurance companies' spending on medical costs versus administrative expenses, the next stop for that proposal will be the desk of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Politico reports. Sebelius will approve - or edit - the proposal for regulating what the industry terms medical-loss ratio, a task that could put her in an awkward position as the arbitrator of insurance firms and consumer advocates. "The report, expected in weeks, isn't likely to be as strict on insurers as top Democrats have hoped. ... But overturning the NAIC could arouse accusations that the agency is playing politics on a highly controversial piece of legislation" (Haberkorn, 8/23).

The Chattanooga Times Free Press reports that "[c]onsumer advocates and doctors are praising reforms that force health insurers to direct more dollars to actual medical care and less to profits and executive bonuses," including the medical-loss ratio rules. "Starting in January, health insurers must spend at least 80 percent of their premium revenue on medical claims for individual and small group plans. For large groups, 85 percent of premium dollars must go to health care. Insurers who don't meet those benchmarks will have to pay rebates to consumers." Also of interest to advocates: new funding for state regulators to keep an eye on premium increases (Bregel, 8/23).

Meanwhile, analysts are saying the rules will be a drag on insurance businesses. Modern Healthcare reports, "[s]truggles to grow revenue and the near-term impact from healthcare reform are dimming the outlook for health insurance companies, according to global credit-rating organization A.M. Best Co… The reform law's medical-loss ratio requirement… will have a significant impact on the industry, the analysis stated" (Lubell, 8/22).

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel notes that health insurance companies "based in Wisconsin generally are well-positioned for one change under health care reform that could cause some pain for their national competitors: The requirement that 80 cents of every dollar in premiums from individuals and small employers be spent on medical care." One insurance executive said, "We'll be fine." The reason is many of the plans are operated by nonprofit health system that "do not have to worry about pleasing Wall Street" (Boulton, 8/21).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Navigating the minefield of AI in healthcare: Balancing innovation with accuracy